Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs in Green Day: Rock Band/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 15:48, 27 September 2011 [1].
List of songs in Green Day: Rock Band[edit]
List of songs in Green Day: Rock Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because... erm... I think it meets the criteria. :) I've put some work into this article and have used experience from taking List of songs in Rock Band 3 to make this list even better at the start of the nomination than that one was. –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
As a comment from when I did the GH lists, it might be better to have a separate body section (or subsection) on the exporting instead of that trailing paragraph. In this, I would add to the fact (well, I know its fact, but I can't immediately recall sources) that the songs with harmonies still support these in RB3 --MASEM (t) 04:19, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay. What should such a section be called? –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I actually just looked at the GH lists and didn't see any such sections. –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There isn't any such section, I would include it in the first main section (not lead) prior to the list itself, simply to explain this factor. The exportability in GH is explained in a similar place and then shown in the tables (since it's not universal for all songs, compared to RBGD and Lego RB). --MASEM (t) 21:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I actually just looked at the GH lists and didn't see any such sections. –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments: Here are the issues that stood out to me.
- The "Announcement" section seems kinda small to be its own section. Maybe combine it to "Music selection" as the last paragraph.
- What makes Plastic Axe a reliable source?
- Why are the two notes for the set lists in different cases. I find that odd especially when the two As state the same thing.
- Note C and D seem like they border on game guide content, but I'll defer to others on whether they should stay.
- Other than the above, the list is in good shape. I'll check back in later. (Guyinblack25 talk 16:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]
- THANK YOU for the review! I agree that the announcement section seems a bit small, but I'm not sure where else it would fit. It doesn't seem like part of the "music selection" process. See [2] for my reasoning regarding Plastic Axe. I've combined the notes into a separate section. Comments on missing or additional parts are quite common in the Guitar Hero song lists, all of which are FL now, and include more minor stuff such as whether or not a song has a double bass drum part in addition to a single bass drum part. I'd say that notes C and D are as, if not more, important to the game's setlist than the vocal parts; note also that List of songs in Rock Band 3 passed FLC with one such footnote and an entire column for keyboard support. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think "Announcement" will fit into "Music selection". If you have reservations, maybe rename the whole thing to "Selection history" or "Track listing history". (Guyinblack25 talk 17:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]
-
- The only other thing I would recommend is mentioning the reception in the lead. I know leads for lists are handled slightly different than articles, so I'm unsure if this is warranted. (Guyinblack25 talk 18:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 22:23, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comment
Other than this it looks good. NapHit (talk) 22:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Comments
Resolved issues
|
---|
|
- Support. All issues have been dealt with as best they can be.∞陣内Jinnai 20:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. After finding no real issues with the content, and no source problems, I think that it fulfills FLC criteria. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 05:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support good work--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫Heyit's me 11:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.