User talk:Bbb23
Blocked user Kingcutie under new sockpuppet HDClear
It appears that user Kingcutie is once again vandalizing his brother's wikipedia page under sockpuppet HDClear, for which he was previously banned by you.
It's not entirely clear to me how to proceed with bringing attention to this.
WIKI PAGE: Har Mar Superstar
OLD USER: User:Kingcutie
NEW USER: User talk:HDClear
Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material, unexplained removal of maintenance tags, advertising or promotion
Hi Bbb23, Can you check the accuracy of this article? Many IP addresses come from the same person. 2 IP address ranges 2001:1388:A44:0:0:0:0:0 and 2001:1388:A45:0:0:0:0:0 Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material, unexplained removal of maintenance tags on Nine (singer)
All edits from the IP address found to be the same person. Harassing and deleting content in other articles which had administrators warn and rollback more than 40 disruptive edits Found the latest edit, redo it. 2001:1388:A44:E5F7:24AC:CE3C:BE06:1E4A [1] 2001:1388:A44:EDDB:98F3:C8BE:82C6:175D [2] Repeatedly adding unsourced content and deleting maintenance tags by correcting them and not explained in the article Nine (singer) in terms of being a fan club Due to adding content to live broadcast activities to sell products Duplicate content is added which is not important. As with most of the content in this article
The entire article was edited by the same person, unexplained removal of maintenance tags, and recently used a new IP address to add a lot of unsourced content. The history reveals many IP addresses from this person who has been harassing for a long time. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
Edit history Nine (singer) has only one person, IP addresses starting with 2001:1388:A45 and 2001:1388:A44 all are the same person The edits will be made in the same way, namely adding information to the article without the source in Nine (singer) and deleting and disturbing other articles. which always has admin rollback This person made repeated changes with new IP addresses like this.
Administrators address disruptive IP address user behavior issues. Continuously adding unsourced content to Nine (singer) A single person from Lima, Peru, used the IP address to reverse an update notification. Unexplained deletion of maintenance tags Modifications were not performed according to the maintenance tag instructions. Please disturb other articles as well.[9]
repeated addition of unsourced content I think examining a person is difficult. This person from Lima, Peru uses a different IP address every time they resolve. Every time delete and add information to another article. will be reversed Then edit again with the new IP address.
This person created information in the Nine (singer) article and also caused mischief in other articles. Add information without references Administrators always roll back edits that this person deleted on other articles. Editing that disturbs another article and edited and added information only to the article Nine (singer) The person using all IP addresses in this Nine (singer) article is the same person who removed the maintenance tag without editing it.
The person using all the IP addresses I attached is the same person. I'm only giving examples because there are many. The entire article Nine (singer) has an IP address from the same person from Lima, Peru, but the IP address in the update is different every time the information is added. This person deleted the maintenance tag notice. Delete without correcting Most articles lack references. As I looked at the article's history, Nine (singer) has been doing this for a long time, but no user has come to check on this person. MeetHoneyBee (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- No idea why you've come to me about this; nor do I understand what you expect me to do about it.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Accusation of being a Sockpuppet of TheCurrencyGuy
Bbb23, in the first fortnight of April this year, an IP server made many edits at British currency in the Middle East and at Egyptian pound. The editor using that IP server was me, and I can assure you that I am definitely not TheCurrencyGuy. Whatever, I was nearly finished what I had set out to do when I found myself blocked and accused of abusing multiple accounts. I'd be most grateful if you could take a second look at this. An editor called classicwiki reported me to the sockpuppet investigation noticeboard as having been carrying out what he termed as "serial edits" at British currency in the Middle East. And because there is a blocked editor called TheCurrencyGuy, this seems to have convinced Classicwiki that me and TheCurrencyGuy must be one and the same person. But surely you must know that the editing style is different, and that the focus of interest is different, and that the IP servers are different. Were the IP servers even geographically close to each other? My IP server was blocked at the same time as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jahor12345 who was simulataneously accused of being a sockpuppet of TheCurrencyGuy. I don't know whether Jahor12345 is a sockpuppet of TheCurrencyGuy or not, but the account was editing at exactly the same time as me on different articles during the morning of 3rd April 2024. My IP server began with detailed edits about the Egyptian pound, and then around noon, switched over to British currency in the Middle East. Meanwhile, editor Jahor12345 was editing across a wide range of currency topics, mainly reformatting. The editing styles are completely different. My IP server carried out edits at 1204hrs and 1206hrs, while Jahor12345 carried out an edit in the middle of that two minute period at 1205hrs. We couldn't possibly be the same person. I really would be most grateful if you could take a closer look at this matter, because otherwise I won't be able to edit on Wikipedia currency articles again without being accused of being a sockpuppet of TheCurrencyGuy. Specialrequestaccount (talk) 20:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Potential block evasion
Is this worth SPI or will a Simple block suffice (assuming you agree that this is evasion, of course)? Special:Contributions/Khan2004kashf and Special:Contributions/Anusmartmirror coincide 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Dotting i's and crossing t's
I assume you have notifications on, but just to be sure. You're mentioned at WP:AN. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- "mentioned" is a nice word. I am aware of the complaint, but thanks for the notification.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Page protection request
Hello Bbb23; I hope you are doing well. Can you please reconsider your recent decision (diff) regarding my request for the protection of List of oldest continuously inhabited cities? Again, besides the page suffering in general from frequent additions that violate WP:OR (including improper editorial synthesis), there is a persistent range of IPs that have been trying to add original research since the middle of February; their activity is clearly disruptive, and has been going on for months now. Unfortunately, I cannot be active on a daily basis, and the aforementioned range of IPs doesn't immediately disrupt the article following my reverts; this might give the appearance that there isn't enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Besides my proposals for a semi-protection or a range block (specifically for the aforementioned page), I believe that a pending changes protection should also be considered. If you have any other alternative proposals, please share them. Demetrios1993 (talk) 02:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I included all of the relevant IPs (both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses) in the {{IP range calculator}}. This produced the following results:
Sorted 7 IPv4 addresses:
- 114.142.172.54
- 114.142.172.62
- 114.142.173.11
- 116.206.14.0
- 116.206.14.40
- 116.206.14.44
- 116.206.15.44
| Total affected |
Affected addresses |
Given addresses |
Range | Contribs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1024 | 512 | 3 | 114.142.172.0/23 | contribs |
| 512 | 4 | 116.206.14.0/23 | contribs | |
| 82 | 16 | 2 | 114.142.172.48/28 | contribs |
| 1 | 1 | 114.142.173.11 | contribs | |
| 64 | 3 | 116.206.14.0/26 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 116.206.15.44 | contribs | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 114.142.172.54 | contribs |
| 1 | 1 | 114.142.172.62 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 114.142.173.11 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 116.206.14.0 | contribs | |
| 8 | 2 | 116.206.14.40/29 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 116.206.15.44 | contribs | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 114.142.172.54 | contribs |
| 1 | 1 | 114.142.172.62 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 114.142.173.11 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 116.206.14.0 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 116.206.14.40 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 116.206.14.44 | contribs | |
| 1 | 1 | 116.206.15.44 | contribs | |
Sorted 5 IPv6 addresses:
- 2400:9800:130:831b:1:0:6c43:183a
- 2400:9800:231:c170:1:0:43e3:f14c
- 2400:9800:270:a67f:1:0:707c:6969
- 2400:9800:270:fcc4:1:0:70ea:738b
- 2400:9800:2b8:7a4b:1:0:18c0:9288
| Total affected |
Affected addresses |
Given addresses |
Range | Contribs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64M /64 | 64M /64 | 5 | 2400:9800::/38 | contribs |
| 16M /64 | 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:130:831b::/64 | contribs |
| 16M /64 | 4 | 2400:9800:200::/40 | contribs | |
| 8M /64 | 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:130:831b::/64 | contribs |
| 8M /64 | 3 | 2400:9800:200::/41 | contribs | |
| 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:2b8:7a4b::/64 | contribs | |
| 32K /64 | 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:130:831b::/64 | contribs |
| 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:231:c170::/64 | contribs | |
| 32768 /64 | 2 | 2400:9800:270:8000::/49 | contribs | |
| 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:2b8:7a4b::/64 | contribs | |
| 5 /64 | 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:130:831b::/64 | contribs |
| 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:231:c170::/64 | contribs | |
| 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:270:a67f::/64 | contribs | |
| 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:270:fcc4::/64 | contribs | |
| 1 /64 | 1 | 2400:9800:2b8:7a4b::/64 | contribs | |
What do you think? Thanks in advance for your time. Demetrios1993 (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Socking/upe/move warring
Bbb23, you recently asked me to refrain from move warring, even though those articles were created by UPE. Now, here is another possible sock/meat puppet, Dafydd y Corach, moving declined drafts to the main namespace after my draftification and using your warning as a shield. How to deal with such cases now? GSS 💬 08:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
@Zzuuzz: Thank you for taking care of them. Would you mind reverting their move? They might have violated WP:SOCK, as your block reason describes, and those articles are not yet ready for the main namespace, with one of them recently being declined. Thank you, GSS 💬 09:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Why revert?
Why did you revert here? I was trying to write a comment and it's frustrating when the comment that I'm replying to suddenly gets reverted. Please at least let me know at my talk page next time. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just posted a message to your Talk page. I have no doubt your intentions are good, but the result of many of your posts is disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Revert deletions
Can you please revert my pages you deleted? I will move it to my userspace. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)