Talk:California Assembly Bill 1084 (2021)

A fact from California Assembly Bill 1084 (2021) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that beginning in 2024, some California stores will be required to have a gender-neutral children's section?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/California Assembly Bill 1084 (2021).

Wikipedia

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Domestic violence in lesbian relationships · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that beginning in 2024, some California stores will be required to have a gender-neutral children's section?
- ALT1: ... that California's requirement that certain stores display a gender-neutral children's section is meant to aid consumers in comparing similar items while shopping?
- ALT2: ... that beginning in 2024, some stores in California may be fined if they do not have a gender-neutral children's section?
- Reviewed: Maloja Wind
- Comment: My first article about a law, or at least the first that made it to mainspace. Feedback and improvements are welcome.

Created by Ezlev (talk). Self-nominated at 03:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Ezlev, while not strictly a fault with this article, there is a big yellow template suggesting it's an orphan. I'm not going to review it (I try to stay away from culture war topics), but before someone does, I suggest that you find the articles where wikilinking the article about the bill could be suitable. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 16:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ezlev: Since it has been over a week since the nomination and a QPQ has not been provided, please provide one within the next seven days. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- QPQ added, Narutolovehinata5, thanks! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 17:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this is ready for a full review. I think the main hook is probably the best option due to having the straightest and least complicated hook fact, but I will leave the final decision to the reviewer. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very interesting article, as always. New enough, long enough. Earwig only catches quotes; I'll try to fix the unreliable source, otherwise cited reliably. Hooks are directly cited and are interesting. Compliant with policy, QPQ done. The main hook is probably best, but I leave it to the promoter since they're all good. Urve (talk) 03:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]