Wikipedia:Picture peer review/SUPERSTITIONS AZ15.jpg

Nice composition, lighting, and overall good quality.

Articles this image appears in: Western United States, Superstition Mountains

Sorry, while this is a pretty photo it isn't likely to succeed at FPC. It's too small for starters - while it technically just scrapes into the size limits, bigger is generally expected for landscape type shots. Even for it's size, the mountains which are the subject seem to be a bit soft; it looks like focus is further forward, possibly on that large cactus. Also the colours don't look that realistic to me, which could be a consequence of this having been scanned from a slide/film which sometimes bring out colours differently from digital (or it could be aged, but no date is given). --jjron (talk) 19:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the above. Firstly the image has a dimension that meets or exceeds 1000 pixels, so it is big enough. Secondly, it is a pretty picture, and one with great quality and detail in both the back and foreground. I will definitely support this if you bring it to suggest it as a FPC! --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in agreement with jjron here, I'd oppose on size alone. For a landscape like this, which is generally considered highly reproducible, we expect much higher then minimums. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 18:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is a nice one. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]