The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Delete. Probably copyvio indeed[1]. WilyD 14:58, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader had a copyright issue with another upload. In that case, he claimed {{PD self}} when it was in fact a logo of Intelius. This image looks like it was taken by a professional, thus giving me reason to believe that the uploader is not the person who actually took this picture. Nishkid64(Make articles, not wikidrama) 18:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200ptalk 00:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Delete. Copyright violation, most certainly. Produced ~1999 WilyD 15:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Likely copyrighted, only used for decorative purposes in article. Kellyhi! 00:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200ptalk 01:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200ptalk 01:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200ptalk 01:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was
Closed. Now a "choose a better name" template. WilyD 15:05, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200ptalk 02:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: At first I was going to speedy this image, but technically, no criteria apply. It has a improper license but not one of the 3 that I3 deals with. It had a public domain license (even if it was wrong) so I didn't use I5. And I1 didn't apply because Image:TheWitcherShadowStairs.png is a lower resolution image.--Rockfang (talk) 04:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please delete this. I uploaded this under the wrong license, so I re uploaded with a new license. I'm kinda new to this, so if there was a way for me to delete it earlier without having to go through this, I didn't know.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Deleted by Anthony Appleyard. Non admin housekeeping closure.
As the original uploader, I have no objection; it's an orphaned fair use image, which is speedyable, I believe. *Dan T.* (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Firstly, see this MfD about the (only) user page that it is used on. Unencyclopedic, no forseeable use in articles and may have copyright issues due to using elements from Star Wars. RichardΩ612Ɣɸ 14:33, May 27, 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Hut 8.5 08:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a free web host. --Stormie (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Users should have fun here and be able to show themselves, but I believe it is starting to violate this and this. SwirlBoy39 04:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Image source (http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/stadium/stadtext/ferry.htm) identifies image as a 1924 Wisconsin game. Image, therefore, was not published before 1.1.1923, as is incorrectly asserted by the PD-US license. Image is credited to "BHL, Ath. Dept.", which is expected to retain copyright. ЭLСОВВОLДtalk 18:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphan, actually found this one out to be in use on a YouTube channel so is being used offsite and violates WP:NOT for file storage. Questionable PD license also as the logos illustrated clearly belong to the BBC. treelotalk 19:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image too large for fair use Snowman (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK to delete, as far as I'm concerned. Macspaunday (talk) 23:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not for profit image. Snowman (talk) 22:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There is almost certainly a free alternative image to illustrate the Chuck Norris Facts article, such as a cartoon released in PD. -- TIM KLOSKE|TALK 22:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
