The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:
Deleted: The image is no longer used, and there is valid dispute about the copyright status. – Quadell(talk) (random) 14:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep BUT this is a copyrighted image that requires a Fair Use notice/rationale (in short, it simply has the wrong label, though the appropriate information is present on the image page). The coat of arms lends some information about this particular subject. It should be noted that the article in which this image appears is up for deletion. IMHO, this image should be kept until the status of the article is determined (as it can lend some credibility to the article). Furthermore, this does not seem to be a violation of WP:UE requiring deletion, as the image can simply be renamed and does not constitute original research in any way. — BQZip01 —talk 04:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (1) as BQ says, it lends credibility to the article, which should be deleted as a bogus hoax. (2) It may identify the real identity of the uploader, who has requested privacy because he is being stalked. [1] (3) The real owner denies on his web-site that he uploaded the image (see [2]) and so the copyright tag may be fallacious. DrKiernan (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Uploaded solely for use on page which was speedily deleted due to lack of importance of web show (a Youtube show created by and starring two teenagers). Can't think of any other way this image could possibly be used. Redfarmer (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the reasons stated and the persistent vandalism by the uploader in constantly removing the CSD tags from the since deleted article. ALLSTARecho 03:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I created this image. but now it's replaced with a better SVG version. Hence no page links to this image now. It can be deleted speedily.Mugunth(ping me!!!,contribs) 06:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC) Mugunth(ping me!!!,contribs) 06:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
derivative work of almost certainly copyrighted statue. in Elvis Presley, the caption says the photo was taken in Memphis TN so freedom of panorama doesn't help us out Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OR Additionally, see all other images uploaded by this user which are now orphaned as a result of his userpage being replaced with a Sockpuppet block notice. Do I need to list them all separately? DachannienTalkContrib 23:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=delete){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=history){kind=link}
