Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Purple Swamphen - Pukeko02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2011 at 21:53:39 (UTC)

Reason: Not used in the article space. The article in which it was once used is illustrated by other strong photographs.
Articles this image appears in: None.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Purple Swamphen - Pukeko02.jpg
Nominator: J Milburn (talk)

Delist — J Milburn (talk) 21:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I prefer this one to Fir's other shot that is used in Purple Swamphen, in large part because of the detail on the legs. It doesn't appear that this image was ever used at that article. Rather, it was in Pukeko until being removed on Jan. 6 for the following reason: "show bird from NZ in introduction sized to 300px - previous one was from Australia." I guess that's fair, since the article says "Pūkeko is the common name, derived from the Māori language, for the Purple Swamphen (Porphyrio porphyrio) in New Zealand", but this image is far superior to the current lead image in that article. Makeemlighter (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better if it wasn't off-topic. The article's subject (Pukeko, i.e. Purple Swamphens in New Zealand) has changed from what it was previously (the subspecies, whose range includes Australia), better reflecting the article's content. This is still a good image - could it claim a spot in the Purple Swamphen article, perhaps? --Avenue (talk) 13:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delist~~ unless a suitable home can be found. --Avenue (talk) 13:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now that it is used in Purple Swamphen. --Avenue (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment At the time of nomination there was only one article, Pukeko. I was unhappy about calling the bird article by something other than it's common name. WP:NZ people disagreed. The result was a split into Pukeko for all of the NZ-centric stuff, and Purple Swamphen for information about the bird. I wouldn't mind betting that the Purple Swamphen article creator just used the other image for a bit of variety. Consequently I've put it in Purple Swamphen. JJ Harrison (talk) 02:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep also. JJ Harrison (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Assuming that it's placement in this new article continues to stand up to scrutiny. Cat-five - talk 18:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Jujutacular ^talk 04:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]