Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lions Gate Bridge Vancouver.jpg
Lions Gate Bridge Vancouver.jpg[edit]
I think it illustrates Vancouver, Lions' Gate Bridge, and Stanley Park well along with the glimpse of a ship that often travel here. Although it might not be the most high-resolution picture available, as long as it is used in an appropriate size, it looks fine. Picture was taken by WB (me) and it is currently used in Vancouver and Lions' Gate Bridge article. - WB 00:56, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Self-nominate and support. - WB 00:56, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Mgm|(talk) 19:53, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Grainy and not very exciting. Junes 22:36, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- If we use it as a smaller image, it would not be grainy. WB 23:28, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral. Might look better with some auto-leveling and/or auto-coloring. Graininess isn't really a problem, but some of the sections look out of focus. --brian0918™ 02:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Can anyone actually do that? I'm not so good with editting pictures... so yeah. thanks. WB 00:00, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. It contains too much that doesn't belong, and while nice, it's not exactly striking. Deltabeignet 02:40, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not striking. Enochlau 08:42, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. When image is viewed I see it isn't clear. Sort of blurred. Definetely a no. • Thorpe • 11:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- As I stated above, as long as we use it as a small image, it's not so blurry. Obviously we are not going to use the full sized image on any articles. WB 18:09, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. A panorama is useless in a small view - and the full view can hardly be called large either. Blurriness (details such as the supporting lines) cannont be seen in the image. --Fir0002 04:49, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
Support. I think the picture has a lot of weight. Plus I just like this bridge. Zhatt 22:30, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)- Oppose - Lions' Gate bridge is a very nice bridge and it is easy to take a nice photo of it. This is not a nice photo of it. The cables of the bridge are not visible even at full size and you can't tell what colour the bridge is. -- Webgeer 16:46, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
Not promoted 3 / 6 / 1 --Spangineer (háblame) 14:07, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
