Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Neophema chrysostoma mortimer 2.jpg

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blue-winged Parrot[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2011 at 03:35:33 (UTC)

Original - Blue-winged Parrot (Neophema chrysostoma), Mortimer Bay, Tasmania, Australia
Edit - Blue-winged Parrot (Neophema chrysostoma), Mortimer Bay, Tasmania, Australia
Reason
Best available image of species. I think File:Neophema chrysostoma mortimer.jpg is a juvenile. This is one of the more wary Tasmanian parrots.
Articles in which this image appears
Blue-winged Parrot
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
Noodle snacks
  • Support as nominator --JJ Harrison (talk) 03:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support a handsome bird. Purpy Pupple (talk) 03:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Overexposed. Jó Kritika (talk) 18:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, it's a light-coloured bird against a bright background. I think the exposure is fine since there's no clipping. The black point may be microscopically off though. Purpy Pupple (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • The parrot isn't over exposed, it is just a light background (overcast sky filtering through eucalyptus leaves) JJ Harrison (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's still too bright. The branch is overexposed, but perhaps just a slight decrease in brightness would make me change my mind (even though I don't favor the "stay-away-from-me" posture of the bird). Jó Kritika (talk) 01:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No it isn't (overexposed). It is a dead eucalypt branch (1, 2 etc). I've posted an edit, burning the branch, but it'd be an edit for aesthetics, not accuracy, if anything. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Either. EV is sufficient, and I'm not seeing the supposed overexposure. NauticaShades 17:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. J Milburn (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Looks good to me. — raekyt 01:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? Makeemlighter (talk) 02:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd prefer the original... — raekyt 01:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original, but I'm not that fussed. I'd gather Jó Kritika would prefer the alt (but not really support it). JJ Harrison (talk) 10:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original, but there's not much in it. J Milburn (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original, I don't know why the branch should be brighter; it's about the bird.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 12:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Neophema chrysostoma mortimer 2.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Neophema_chrysostoma_mortimer_2.jpg&oldid=1083674123"