Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Metal Gear Solid characters/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Metal Gear Solid characters[edit]

I have recently been spending some time redoing this article and I have cross checked it with the criteria for WP:FL and it passes all of them. All the info on the characters is verified and all plot summary is kept to a minimum per WP:FICT, so yeah, I'd like to see what the community thinks.

†he Bread 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Please expand the lead. Michaelas10 (Talk) 09:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - messy layout, unnecessary bolding & linking, poor layout. Why Main and Other Characters don't have descriptions? Renata 23:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • They don't have descriptions because they are in other articles, or have their owna articles, there's no point having an entry here when there is already one somewhere else, also what bolding and hows the layout messy? †he Bread 23:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • You were right about the links though, they've been fixed †he Bread 23:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Object. Incomplete (featured list criterion 1.b.) - nine major characters have no description at all, they simply have their articles wikilinked to. Unverified (featured list criterion 1.c.). Images with no source information (featured list criterion 3). -- Steel 02:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This has pretty much been seen to. -- Steel 11:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • One, what is unverified? Two the images have sources they are from a press kit, Three, why have descriptions of characters who already have their own articles †he Bread 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • 1) Unverified as in "no sources". 2) Where is this press kit? 3) Because otherwise you could reduce the article to this and call it a featured list. I strongly suggest you take a look at some current featured lists of people to see how they do it. -- Steel 02:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Urggh, source what? The plot summary, I can't compare it to other lists as there is no precident for a character list, the closest thing is this, which isn't helpful at all. †he Bread 02:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • Content in Wikipedia needs a source. This is pretty basic stuff. And I realise there are currently no FLs of game characters, but there are still lists of people. -- Steel 02:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak object. I think this is almost there. There's a bit more that can be done:
    • The refs kind of suck, formatting-wise. I'd suggest using {{cite web}}; if you don't do this, I might end up doing it myself.
    • We can probably ditch {{Metal Gear series}} since this list isn't linked on it.
    • I haven't had any luck finding a properly sourced copy of the images of FOXHOUND. My suggestion would be to use the shadowy image of FOXHOUND from the intro; screenshots are easy to source, and it would be one image in lieu of several. If that image isn't at all useful (which is possible; I've not played MGS in a while) screenshots shouldn't be hard to find.
    • We can probably ditch all the redlinks to voice actors, unless a reasonable stub (which is more than "Foo Bar is a voice actor. He was the voice of Quux."
    • A copyedit is desperately needed. I noticed several typos, as well as some mangled prose.
    I'll do some cleanup when I'm in the mood to fiddle, but the copyedit and the image issues need to be resolved before this can be featured. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also, what guild is the intro talking about? A wikilink could help; an explanation might be better. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Guild as in union? i'll see what I can do, and I've got 1/3 screenshots up and errors fixed †he Bread 05:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about the red links last night actually, and about the shadowy image I'd like to Use it but where to put it, also I'll try and find the closeups of each characters face (well Wolf Raven and Manits at least). I have been using {{Citeweb}} though, though I may have missed it in places.

†he Bread 03:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Object a little messy for me and also the concerns raised by others.__Seadog 02:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Okay, this is the page as I last edited it. All sketches have been replaced with sourced screenshots (It turns out the shadowy FOXHOUND pic had no source and it wasn't really effective at showing the characters), given a copyedit, all characters now have descriptions and plot summary is sourced. Are there any other things that need to be done to done to the article before it is a WP:FL

†he Bread 00:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, but why do only a few characters in the middle have images? Isn't it good to be consistent? bibliomaniac15 02:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ideally I’d like to give all of them images, but WP:FU (WP:FUC? I can't rememeber) states to use as few fair use images as possible, also Snake, Fox, Meryl, Liquid, Ocelot, Mei Ling, Roy Campbell all have images in their pages or sections in pages. Also giving them all images would created alot of whitespace as we discovered at List of Metal Gear Solid 3 characters. I came to the desicion to give Wolf, Mantis and Raven images because of all the ones left over who don't have images on other pages, they were the only ones whose appearance was fairly distinct. Baker Anderson and Housemen are just old men in suits (pretty much) and Naomi will eventually be moved to List of recurring Metal Gear characters where there is enough plot summary to justify giving an image without creating whitespace and she only appears over the radio in the game we never actually see her whole body. Thanks for the support, hope the reply wasn't too longwinded or preachy†he Bread 02:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The characters who have images are the FOXHOUND members, who are various outlandish soldiers with unusual specialties and appearances, whereas the characters who don't either have their own articles (which have their own image) or are just talking heads (the codec support team, the guys in suits). - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I think i've fixed the refs if you'd like to check them out, they're either {{citebook}}, {{citeweb}}, {{cite video}} or a quote, and now I have got a relevant wikilink in the place of the union sponsered thing. Do I have your support? †he Bread 09:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments: lead is still too short. There is no need to bold character names. Renata 23:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support: It's well-written and passes guidelines, but some things are a tad confusing.
    • In the Meryl Silverburgh section, it brings up Roy Campbell without explaining who he is or what he does. This could be remedied by bringing up Roy Campbell in the Solid Snake section.
    • Same deal in the Gray Fox section, except this time mentioning Otacon and Liquid Snake.
    • In the Revolver Ocelot section, who is Kenneth Baker? The Solid Snake section mentions the ArmsTech President, but not his name Kenneth Baker.
    • Big Boss is brought up in the Sniper Wolf section, but who is Big Boss?
    • In the Jim Houseman section, it says he is the mission controller via AWACS. Can you give a small iteration to what this is? (technical terms need to be explained)

Nice work. I also suggest making things a little more comprehensive, but it's not as important as the above issues. Information on Big Boss may be a help too. Once the above points are fixed I will change to a normal "support."--TheEmulatorGuy 02:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]