Looks like it should be featured. Plenty of references, images, style seems clean. Just H 01:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Half of the article's lenght is preoccupied with references in popular culture. The page contains listy sections, external jumps, and incomplete websource info. Recommend expansion, a copy edit, peer review and resubmission. Ceoil 01:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Object for the reasons above. This piece of information, "The 1990s comic book series Witchblade saw Boudicca as one of the original wielders of the Witchblade." is an example. I recommend removing all such trivia to a seperate article Boudicca in popular culture as soon as possible.--Zleitzen(talk) 10:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
