User talk:Tcpekin/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gosh, I'd welcome you but I see it's already been done. For future reference, it's considered more polite to leave other users' comments on your talk page. Melchoir 00:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Tcpekin/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- KHM03 12:16, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I added back KHM03. Tom 00:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Thanks for starting San Diego Yacht Club! Melchoir 01:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

91X Top 91 Lists[edit]

An article you started has been nominated for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 1995. Feel free to contribute to the discussion. NickelShoe 16:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of articles you created have been deleted after an AFD - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 1996 for details. Basically, the articles were lists with no explanation whatsoever. They do not appear appropriate for an encyclopaedia. Of course, you could restore them after a couple of weeks if you provide information asserting the importance of the lists. Have a look at some other Wikipedia articles before you create any further articles of this particular type. Do not be discouraged. I'm sure that you will make many super contributions to Wikipedia in future.--File Éireann 18:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you look at this page (Warned.net) and tell me if it should be deleted; I stumbled upon it while looking at random pages, and I would like your feedback.Tom 04:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I'd just leave it be. It gets over six hundred Google hits, which is something. I don't figure that article is hurting anything by being there. But I don't feel strongly enough to vote keep if you nominated it. NickelShoe 05:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]