User talk:Extreme Unction

Note: My WikiActivity levels these days are extremely low. I log in twice a year, if that, to create the occasional article, but otherwise do my editing anonymously.

/Archive 1
/Archive 2

Congrats!

Ooooo clean page. --Syrthiss 14:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Pristine, virgin-like, etc. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 14:52, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Nefarious admin reverses all your decisions

Well, one of them. I deleted "Steel Detailer" after all per my note on Stormraven's talk page. Hope you don't mind. Demi ^T/_C 20:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Curse you, Demi! You'll pay for this! By all that's holy, you'll pay!!1!!1!

All the best.

Ξxtreme Unction|_{yakkity yak} 21:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Please accept my embarrassingly belated thank you for supporting my RfA, which much to my surprise passed 102/1/1, earning me minor notoriety. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have already started doing the things people wanted me to be able to do. And hopefully nothing else... Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

RFD/CSDR2 question

Per a discussion with Radiant! at WT:CSD, I'm deleting most CSD-R2 candidates that I found via SQL query. User:Extreme Unction/redirects says that redirects should be orphaned first before deleting them. Do you know whether this always applies, even to Talk pages? In particular, Edwinstearns is a redirect to User:Edwinstearns, but it has 92 backlinks, because the user included the link in his/her signature on talk pages. (there are several others that have some number of backlinks, such as Criticisms of Christianity/new, but the maximum I've found is 9, which isn't too bad). (also, for what it's worth, the list I'm currently working off of is here) Any advice? --Interiot 15:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

My personal feeling is that backlinks which arise as a consequence of someone's signature have no real need to be orphaned, except in cases where the signature links result in the redirect page being continually recreated. But those should be rare enough that we can address them individually as they arise. Backlinks which arise from non-signature sources should probably be orphaned, however. Ξxtreme Unction|_{yakkity yak} 21:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks. Keep up the good work. --Interiot 02:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Machine Gun (song)

i noticed that you requested that this article be expanded, and i would appreciate if you would elaborate on that a bit on the discussion page. thanks. -Joeyramoney 19:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid you've mistaken me for someone else. First I've ever heard of Machine Gun (song). Ξxtreme Unction|_{yakkity yak} 18:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Change in afd

I saw the notice and don't know if you are in. If you are and don't care I have a question about the new prod I've seen but not used yet---can this replace afd or is it a separate policy concerning articles for deletion. What I'm trying to say is if I see an article that looks afd to me can I use a prod instead?. I read the topic but still want to make sure before I proceed. Thanks.--Dakota ~ ° 02:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back. I have not seen but a couple. If no objections or removal they go, if either afd. Thanks and good to see you back.--Dakota ~ ° 14:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

unction?

I'd heard of the prayer "last rites with extreme unction" (which Charlie Farquharson refers to as the "last rites with extreme Moncton". The closest I've been able to find to a definition of "unction" on its own is [1][2][3][4] which seems a bit vague. The inference that unction is the force and energy with which a preacher preaches as a true believer, or something like that. As for the extreme Moncton? They're on Acadian time, so I presume the prayer would get to wherever it needs to go an hour quicker? --carlb 13:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Unction, my friend, means anointing - unguent which is a cream or lotion comes from the same word; so does unctuous which means greasily obsequious. Extreme unction means final anointing ....or lubrication, which might be what the bishop was doing when he was caught out. Lechaim! Paul venter 20:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, Unction is anointing with oil, specifically it is the sacrament of anointing the sick with oil as part of a prayer for their healing. Extreme Unction is the name used when this anointing with oil is done at or near to the time of death. In most Anglican Church or Roman Catholic Church dioceses the oil is blessed on Maundy Thursday by the Bishop, and a small measure of it is taken away by each Priest from the service, back to his own church, for use during the ensuing year. Timothy Titus 01:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Userfication

Have you seen this? Thought you might want a look. Cheers! BD2412 T 17:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Free beer!

Your vote/opinion on brewery notability is requested here: [5] SilkTork 12:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Corollary to your law

Not sure how interested you are, but I figured I'd alert you that I added a corollary to your second law on Raul's Laws page. [6] It's something I've noticed quite a bit, and it seemed to fit nicely as a corollary to your law rather than a separate law itself. Cheers, EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 08:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Terracotta Army

If you would please return to the talk section so we can debate this issue. I strongly feel that section should be removed from the article and still have valid arguments for removal. --OrbitOne ^[Talk|Babel] 12:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Although it is your opinion they should be included, why is your opinion more binding or valid than mine? And please use the talk page to make arguments instead of edit summeries. --OrbitOne ^[Talk|Babel] 13:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

It sounds as though you might be interested in the similar debate on Talk:Hwacha? It is currently in a 'cooling off' period as per WP:DR, but I expect that heated discussion will resume early next week. The issue at hand is whether references to video games belong in a "serious" encyclopedia. Your participation would be welcomed. --Matt 21:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Švejk administers extreme unction

Heh heh, your name made me chuckle, partly because it's a humorous term in general, but also because I was just re-reading one of my favorite books, The Good Soldier Švejk, and there is a whole chapter called "Švejk administers extreme unction". (He is a bumbling soldier, eventually he is assigned to be the assistant of a drunken chaplain, and for a chapter or two they are trying to make money by administering extreme unction. Heh heh..) Dan Carkner 02:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Help (re disambiguation)

Thanks for your kind note, but I don;t think I did the disambiguation correctly. I was only able to create a disambiguation page by adding (disambiguation). To access the topic you have to put Francis Barrett (disambiguation) in the search engine, otherwise, you get routed to Francis Barrett. I have looked at other (correctly done) disambiguation pages and they do not have the word (disambiguation) next to the topic name. Please help. Kieran Cummins 00:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I hope I get the hang of it (creating disambiguation pages) b/c there are a few more I would like to do. Thanks again. Kieran Cummins 03:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

zomgbbq!

Great to see you back! Um, except that I'm Sharply Reducing my participation in this gig. Hm. Well. Hope things are good by you! FreplySpang 17:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

slum dweller

Why did you delete slum dweller? 1.5 billion people are slum dwellers. Slum, where you redirected it to, is architecture. A slum dweller is a person. These people seem unrepresented on wikipedia which favours rich minorities. Take for example Sloane Ranger. Please explain your thinking. Tkay 20:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Loginsuccess

The idea was to make Wikipedia more comprehensible to beginning editors. You mention byzantine pathways... I'm quite sure it has only gotten worse since last year. Before I edited, it simply sent people to CAT:POL with the recommendation to read it. Obviously, that's not helpful. However, {{welcome}} doesn't quite cut it either because with the steady influxes of socks, imposters, and vandalcounts, I'm not at all convinced that all new users get welcomed.

This is only part of the larger problem: in my experience, most novice 'pedians understand just about zilch of how the Wiki works (and tend to jump like conclusions such as "let's vote on this", or "you can't do that, WP:PAGE is not policy!" or "OMG I can do anything 'cuz IAR says so").

Actually I don't think what I wrote earlier was all that verbose and at least moderately useful, and advanced editors can just ignore it (it's far less obtrusive than {{talkheader}}, for one). Sending them to the helpdesk rather than the Pump is ok by me. Anyway, suggestions welcome. >Radiant< 21:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Ahhhhh!

You keep beating me to the deletedpage template! Keep up the good NPP :). alphaChimp^(talk) 04:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deviantnation.com

Your retention [7] is appreciated. Thanks! William Pietri 02:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

A couple of well-intentioned questions

1. Can you summarize in, say, 50 words or less, the exact nature of the conflict between you and Radiant?

I will try:

1   2     3      4            5     6    7       8   9  10 11  12    13   14     15  16    17      18   19
He abused his administrative powers by reverting my edit to a version he favored and then protected the page.

(hey.. pretty good! I'm usually overly wordy! But this short synopsis does everyone and the issue a disservice by focusing on a "conflict" rather than an error and a problem.)

2. Why the sense of dreadful urgency?

Other than the fast revert of my edit and the protection of that page, I was not aware of any dreadful urgency. Its a funny idea.

Now my turn for a question. What is your concern in this matter?

Regards

--Blue Tie 04:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Turtle treasure

Hi, I started a Turtle_treasure article, and you deleted it, I thought the subject was hillarious, and was hoping that someone who knew more about it would post some more information, seeing as you can't find much on the web. Just thought you were a bit mean to delete it :(

Wikipedia:Discuss, don't vote

Hi,

Obviously you think that Wikipedia:Discuss, don't vote should be guideline. However, its quite unclear to me that there is consensus to make it guideline. Guideline isn't just invented by observers of how people do things on wikipedia. The admins you hang around might not be the admins others hang around. Wikipedia is a big place, and it works on *consensus*. I do not find that the page has consensus to be considered a guideline. If you can help me find somewhere where people support making it consensus (somewhere with more than like.. 4 people) then I'll let this slide - but otherwise, I don't see why you think this is proper. Please discuss this on the talk page - whether the page is "disputed" in general or not really doesn't matter, theres a problem and it needs to be resolved, please be part of the solution by discussing it. Fresheneesz 07:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

BeerReference

By all means, do feel free to recreate it with the links you mentioned. With all of the articles on really unnotable websites flooding this site, it's easy to "step on the toes" of a really notable one which simply lacks references. Thanks for the note and I wish you the best. - Lucky 6.9 02:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• PS: I should have looked at who was adding this in the first place. I am REALLY sorry. - Lucky 6.9 02:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, my friend. With all the abuse we get on a daily basis just maintaining the mop and bucket, a really nice note like yours is deeply appreciated. - Lucky 6.9 02:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Jlambert

Hi, Extreme, I have not noticed that you already have given User:Jlambert a warning for the 3RR violation and gave him a 24h block since he has already been blocked on the same article and was unblocked on the promise to avoid revert warring. I am not familiar with the history of the article so feel free to unblock the guy if you feel I was to harsh. abakharev 05:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Consensus

I recall Cryptic as a competent and intelligent user, and am both surprised and disappointed to see that he appears to have left. Do you know what's up with that?

Anyway. Yes, those words are appropriate. The problem is that if a group gets bigger, it is increasingly unlikely that everyone can live with something. Some people claim that consensus doesn't scale and that we need a more formal way of creating guidelines and such. While I'm not sure I like formalism much, I tend to agree that the current method is far from ideal - witness WP:CHILD as a proposal that seems to be pretty much derailed now, in that a compromise is being vehemently refused.

The biggest problem, however, is not disagreement, but misconceptions. Once people have some kind of misconception about how things work, they can with all best intentions edit p/g pages to conform to what they perceive is proper, yet this has the effect of spreading the misconception. For instance, most opposition to WP:DDV is because people think AFD is a vote - but those people were led to think that because we didn't (seem to) have a guideline against voting. That's a vicious cycle that needs to be broken. But we can't expect people to not have misconceptions because Wikispace is so convoluted that people cannot be expected to read through it. And we can't reduce Wikispace because a group this large cannot be expected to not have rules. It's a confusing world in here...

>Radiant< 11:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Please join us in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Policy and Guidelines. >Radiant< 15:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, that project is not very purposeful at the moment :) however it appears that the policy-proposing system is, to some extent, breaking down, in that there are several proposals that are considered both passed and failed depending on whom you ask, and that both sides act accordingly. This may be inevitable on a wiki this size, but it causes strife and confusion. The first solution that comes to mind would be a PolCom to decide on policy, but that would be decidedly unwiki so I don't think it's such a good idea. Tricky issue, no? >Radiant< 11:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

StarGateWars

Thankyou, can you please delete StarGateWars, I shall create one fit for wiki later.Tyscorp 15:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

You've yet to make it and its just been deleted.Bkkeim2000 00:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Dates

Apologies, i knew there was a special format for triggering the preferences thing, but for some reason i thought the way i was doing it was right instead of yours. sorry about that!
best,
tom. -W guice 12:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka

Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. However, I appreciate that you took the time to participate, as I find it a valuable thing to understand how I am perceived by others in the Wikipedia community. Though the RfA was unsuccessful, I intend to continue contributing in a positive manner to Wikipedia, and if there is anything that I can do in the future to help further address your concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. --Elonka 10:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Nice picture on your userpage. :) — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 15:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Louisiana Wikipedians

Hi, my name is Cory, and I'm working on a story for the Advocate about people in Louisiana who create and maintain Wikipedia pages, particularly ones about the area and its inhabitants. I noticed you posted on another user's discussion page that you are from the area. If you would be willing to participate in an interview for it, could you reply by e-mail?

Thanks, Cory

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gallagher (comedian)02.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gallagher (comedian)02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:BTT_current.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BTT_current.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 06:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Gallagher_(comedian)01.gif

I have tagged Image:Gallagher_(comedian)01.gif as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 22:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Gallagher_(comedian)03.jpg

I have tagged Image:Gallagher_(comedian)03.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 22:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image review

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Media Inspection Team

Hi, I was told to perhaps give the idea a second chance.

What do you think? -- Cat ^chi? 17:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The orb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The orb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gallagher (comedian)02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gallagher (comedian)02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tftd.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tftd.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Emperorterracotta.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Emperorterracotta.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Deadlands.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Deadlands.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Abdication

I, Extreme Unction, hereby abdicate my responsibilities as a Wikipedia admin.

As a practical matter, I abdicated them years ago. I'm just making it official now. I visit Wikipedia on a near daily basis, and make frequent anonymous edits. But my urge to actually exercise my admin authority has been non-existent for at least two years, and shows no signs of returning.

Ξxtreme Unction
21:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your contributions, and best wishes. ++Lar: t/c 00:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Good luck, do consider returning someday to this name. MBisanz ^talk 07:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Devadasy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Devadasy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devadasy. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Farix (Talk) 23:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Land Shark (Saturday Night Live)

The article Land Shark (Saturday Night Live) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

SNL sketch that doesn't meet notability guidelines. No decent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 05:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

YOU TUBE.COM shows comedian GALLAGHER suffering his minor heart arrest on stage!

From user: Jon Steven Nelson - YouTube.com shows comedian GALLAGHER suffering his first ever heart stoppage arrest during his gig in a town in Minnesota. GALLAGHER was doing his sledge-o-matic national anthem satire, when he lifted his mallet, he collapsed to the floor in front of everyone at the gig. Jon Steven Nelson (talk) 18:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bacon press

The article Bacon press has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

May be for Wiktionary but not WP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keith 00:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Land Shark (Saturday Night Live) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Land Shark (Saturday Night Live) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land Shark (Saturday Night Live) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Industrial Monk

The article Industrial Monk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and NBAND: Due-diligent BEFORE did not produce any demonstrably independent and reliable sources offering significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 17:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Extreme Unction

Thank you for creating Dunqul Oasis.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yoginder Sikand

The article Yoginder Sikand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think this passes the "average professor test" for notability for academics. I'm not finding any prestigious awards, high-level positions, widely-cited publications, or coverage of him in particular (as opposed to occasional quotes from him as a subject expert).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
3. Update your signature to fix the error.
4. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

1. In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)