User:Aaron Schulz/RfB

A good candidate must:

Intrinsic requirements

• Understand consensus
• Believe that Bureaucrates principly "measure" consensus
• AGF (reasonably) and be willing to listen and put thought into things
• Be well trusted
• Must know when to IAR; not be overly bureacratic or focused on simple stats
• Plan to use the tools significantly, not just get the title and sit there
• Be in touch with what being an editor/admin means

Indicators of some of the above

• Have been decently active in RfA at least in the 30 days or so
  • Exceptions obviously for users with illnesses. Also, a user that was at least very active a few months ago at RfA could pass if it was clear that they were going to become and stay active.
• Have experience as an administrator
• Continue to edit somewhat, as that keeps them in touch with our goals