Talk:Pope Benedict XVI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articlePope Benedict XVI was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 6, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 27, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 9, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 4, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 14, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 28, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
October 4, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
In the news News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on February 11, 2013, and December 31, 2022.
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 19, 2017.
Current status: Delisted good article

The redirect Porta Fidei has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13 § Porta Fidei until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 00:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOS request[edit]

Requesting partial or full reversion of this edit [1], per WP:OVERLINK. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Age record[edit]

Benedict had the longest lifespan among popes in nearly 800 years. This needs to be mentioned. --95.24.68.78 (talk) 21:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's assuming we're including time as a former pope. GoodDay (talk) 22:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missing alternate perspectives including controversies which can be found with most public figures. Interesting that was left out.[edit]

Namely the critiques in how sexual abuse cases were handled, acknowledged by him or even the alleged accusations. This article is biased. 71.17.81.187 (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you show some sources? ''Flux55'' (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]