Talk:Ho Ho Ho (album)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 08:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • by American singer RuPaul → you should specify that he's a drag queen, as well here
  • written by Joe Carrano and RuPaul → state "written by Joe Carrano and RuPaul" here for alternation
  • I do not see the difference that you are pointing out; could you please explain this to me? Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: OMG, I meant "written by Joe Carrano and the singer", sorry ;)
  • specifically "All Alone on Christmas" → specifically of "All Alone on Christmas"
  • I do not believe that this is correct; "specifically" without the "of" is the appropriate construction in this context. Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • negatively responded → other way round
  • of his VH1 talk show The RuPaul Show → when was this?

Infobox[edit]

  • Only link "executive producer" once in the "Producer" row

Recording and release[edit]

  • saying "You can hear us → saying, "You can hear us
  • a clear message; RuPaul explained: "Even the → a clear message, "Even
  • Rhino executive promoted → what does it mean to promote smth executive?
  • An executive is a job title so it is referencing an executive from the record label and how he or she promoted something. Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • was made available on on October 28, 1997 → we only need one "on"

Composition[edit]

  • "the fact that I'm doing it" → "the fact that [he is] doing it"
  • The final track is a remix of the "Celebrate" → "his" instead of "the"
  • I do not believe that is correct. This is the final track of the album; if you put "his final track" that is implying that it is RuPaul's final song ever, which is obviously not true as he released albums/songs after that and is still releasing music. Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • It peaked at number 31 on Billboard Dance Club Songs chart on October 11, 1997 and remained on the chart for a total of seven weeks.[13] → This isn't relevant in any sort of way here, so I would suggest removing it.
  • If you clicked on the link, you would notice that Billboard attributes the song to this album. I would imagine that commercial performance of a song would be relevant to the album in which the song appears. Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

  • Ken Veeder of The Advocate praised RuPual's → "RuPaul's" is written incorrectly
  • positivel responding → "positively" is written incorrectly
  • Melinda Newman referenced the album → Melinda Newman referenced the album to
  • I use the construction "reference x as"; the construction "reference x to" would not be appropriate in this context. Aoba47 (talk) 17:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "[m]akes me want to shove a candy cane in my eye" → "[m]akes [him] want to shove a candy cane in [her] eye"
  • Connect the third paragraph to the second one
  • Not done as these two paragraphs are discussing two completely different ideas. The second paragraph is about negative reviews while the third is about a more joke review. Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Include the info about the commercial performance above in the "Charts" section

Track listing[edit]

  • Corrected things here by myself

Personnel[edit]

  • Change all "-"s to "–"

Track listing[edit]

  • Fixed all alone here

Other stuff[edit]

Copy-violation[edit]

  • 33.3% is still acceptable!

Links[edit]

References[edit]

  • As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article

Outcome[edit]

'Passing this! YAY! Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.