Talk:React Media, LLC/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mdann52 (talk · contribs) 12:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Some unsourced statements; However, they seem to have citations elsewhere backing them up.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Has focused coverage, without getting over-detailed or undue.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   The only reverted content seems to be vandalism

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Only issue is the watermark on the image; However, I'm sure the people at Commons will (eventually) get rid of it

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   No problems that I can see, I feel that this is a clear pass.