Talk:Al-Khalid/VT-1A/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Prabash.A (talk · contribs) 00:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

• I will get to this in a moment, as soon as the under construction template goes away I will start the review Prabash.Akmeemana 00:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey thanks Prabash! Faizan 15:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• As soon as I look down, I see one "citation needed" tag near the bottom, It would be gladly appreciated, if this tag gets replaced with a good reference.
• References are where they are supposed to be,
• The article is fleshed out enough, so this looks fine for GA now. Prabash.Akmeemana 15:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Great! I will give it a finishing touch tomorrow. Faizan 15:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hm, and make sure the article meets all the criteria described below! Prabash.Akmeemana 15:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Sure. Can you get the ticks for the areas in good position, below? Because all I can see are the 'equal signs'. Review it, and get ticks to the good areas in assessment. Faizan 16:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay! have done as you pleased! Prabash.Akmeemana 17:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Prabash. Things look awesome now. Good to go! Faizan 18:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Assessment

• I will get to this as soon as the issues are fixed!
• This looks like a good pass, only two issues are currently present, and that is the citation needed tag and the under construction template, once those are gone, I would call it a pass! Prabash.Akmeemana 17:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• This looks like a good pass! Prabash.Akmeemana 18:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Result

• Pass the article passed all of the above GA criteria. Prabash.Akmeemana 11:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.