File talk:Voting res 2758.png

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The map shows, amongst other things:

  • Western Sahara (then a Spanish colony);
  • Southwest Africa (now Namibia and then a SA colony);
  • British Honduras (now Belize and then a British colony),

all expressing a view (yes, no or abstain) on the UN "China" vote. How can this be accurate? On what basis is it claimed that these territories were regarded as having expressed any vote on the matter? They were I believe all on the UN list for de-colonisation at the time. Moreover, if these territories get counted then how come Greenland does not. In my opinion, none of them should as I don't believe this is accurate. There are likely other discrepancies too. Frenchmalawi (talk) 14:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greenland[edit]

Greenland is a constituent of Denmark (as are the Faroe Islands) and should be green aswell ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 06:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]