File talk:Indian States and Union Territories by HDI (2018) (3).png

Another range

@Abh9850: I suggest you to

• add another range 75.0–79.9 at the top and change the current top one to 70.0–74.9.
• add the state boundaries.

as in the older image file. And you were suppose to discuss this in the talk page before straight out removing the older image - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

another range isn't needed, > 0.700 is high HDI

i will add state borders, i impromptu decided not to because the no border map looked a bit more pleasing and easier to digestAbh9850 (talk) 16:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

@Abh9850: Add the range or it will be reverted as you didn't propose it in the talk page. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

why? it makes no sense to add another range for 2 states when according to UNDP > 0.700 is high HDI Abh9850 (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

@Abh9850: Then what was the purpose of lower ranges? I suggest you do that for now since your primary concern was that the file was in Telugu which you corrected. As for two slabs upwards of .700, raise a concern in the talk page and wait. People have agreed on the old image for some reason. You cannot come and change all in one day. That needs consensus - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

So, people agreed to use old image which was in telugu? that doesn't make sense mate. The purpose of the lower ranges is that there are a lot of states and UT covered by them (13 in 1st tier, 13 in second tier, 10 in third and fourth. It makes the map and the color coding easier to read, but if you're so troubled by not having 2 states in another tier, ill change it back Abh9850 (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

@Abh9850: Do so. You know what, Wikipedia is not a personal blog. There are cases in which a mere mention of "cause of death" in the infobox required all sorts of administrative interventions. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

I know mate but your map is completely arbitrary too and makes no sense either. Btw, I didn't see any talk page or discussion on the map either so dunno Abh9850 (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

@Abh9850: Listen, the ranges should be fixed. There are .05 jumps, why not create another range. Just because there are lesser number of states above .75 now doesn't mean there wouldn't be in future. If you want your image to be in the article for longtime, you should keep the ranges fixed so that something is kept as a standard and people can make edits on it not delete it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)