I feel that this image should also include a, either approximate or exact, a publication date for the manuscript in the photograph, not just the photograph itself.

==[edit]

Judging by the state of the manuscript, as well as the script used for the text and style of notation, this cannot be any earlier than the 1600s, and hence really is not early notation in any way. InfernoXV (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]