File:Universal Medicine Wollongbar.png

Summary[edit]

Licensing[edit]

This is a representation of a government, military, regimental, family, or other symbol such as a flag, seal, emblem, coat of arms or crest. This symbol may be copyrighted by its holder. As well, it is known that the representation of this symbol is either copyrighted by the holder of the symbol or is not available under a free licence. There may also be other restrictions on reproduction, including but not limited to article 6ter of the Paris Convention. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of such symbols to illustrate the symbol in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as non-free use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Universal_Medicine_Wollongbar.png true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Since Wikipedia is supposed to be based in fact it should be made known that this image is not a logo of anything related to Universal Medicine yet it is being purported to be. The picture is a photo shopped image that was used on a website used as an example of where Universal Medicine might go in the future. The sign does not exist and never actually existed in the real world.I have attempted to point this out on the talk page for Universal Medicine and have had all sorts of bizarre conspiracy theories thrown at me. I am at a loss as to why I would lie about this. It would seem that if a photograph is to appear on any page of wikipedia it should a true representation of something real. If it is to serve as " a primary means of visual identification' then it is not doing its job. A photograph of the Universal Medicine clinic rather than a photoshopped creation Choose12 (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)would seem to be more appropriate.