File:Moir Koowarta cartoon.gif

Cartoon by Alan Moir depicting the judgment in Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen, first published on 13 May 1982 in The Courier-Mail, two days after the decision was handed down.

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work: To illustrate the subject in question Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Moir_Koowarta_cartoon.gif true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale. This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Fair use for Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen[edit]

The image linked here is claimed to be used under fair use as:

1. it is a historically significant depiction of a famous event;
2. it is of much lower resolution than the original (copies made from it will be of inferior quality);
3. the image is only being used for informational purposes; and
4. its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows how the case, a historically significant event, impacted on the public. bainer (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)