Talk:Site Number 4 Mnt 85

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:GEOFEAT applies to heritage-listed buildings[edit]

The issue about Notablity was covered in this deletion nomination discussion for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/27–29 Fountain Alley. The discussion says: WP:GEOFEAT, which says Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable. Being on the NRHP, this passes WP:GEOFEAT. This is a Wikipedia:Stub and should contain enough information for other editors to expand upon it. Greg Henderson (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request - update text[edit]

  • Under the History section, please update the 2nd paragraph for the sentence:
  • "The preliminary results seem[according to whom?] to parallel those from CA-MNT-44, featuring components from both the Early and Late periods. Recent acquisition of fiber, cordage materials, wood, flaked stone, shell beads, and feather artifacts from CA-MNT-85 has occurred, originating from a collection amassed by a pot-hunter. The analysis is anticipated to conclude within the year[timeframe?] and is expected to significantly contribute to our understanding of the Esselen Native American people."
  • To the following:
    • "According to U.S. Forest Service, the preliminary results seem to parallel those from CA-MNT-44, featuring components from both the Early and Late periods. Recent acquisition of fiber, cordage materials, wood, flaked stone, shell beads, and feather artifacts from CA-MNT-85 has occurred, originating from a collection amassed by a pot-hunter. The analysis was anticipated to conclude in 2002 and was expected to significantly contribute to our understanding of the Esselen Native American people."[1]

Greg Henderson (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The changes are not supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 16:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: @Cowboygilbert: Sorry, I did not make this more clear. I've now added the reliable source.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b "Ethnographic Overview of the Los Padres National Forestwork=Northwest Economic Associates" (PDF). February 6, 2004. pp. 84, 132, 134–135, 142–143. Retrieved 2024-03-12.

Greg Henderson (talk) 14:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]