Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/July

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposals, July 2010

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.

NEW PROPOSALS

{{Poland-museum-stub}} and Category:Polish museum stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This is OK? Sorry I create many without tag, I not know of it. Please help re-stub tag my stubs. Sorry.Starzynka (talk) 16:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Given that the template has well over 60 articels I see no reason not to Speedy Support this one. Waacstats (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

split of Category:United States film director stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
propose split by decade of birth following the pattern of the film actors i.e

Waacstats (talk) 12:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:Individual ship or boat stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
just oversized but the following seems reasonable at over 200 articles.

anyone spot anything else. Waacstats (talk) 12:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Support, for starters. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Support, because it's pretty tough now to pick out merchant ships from the current list. My guess is that merchant ships have a slightly different community of editors from the naval ships, because the information for merchant ship articles comes from somewhat different sources. Splitting the category would make it more useful for editors with sources on hand for one or the other type.
Another reason to add this tag is the fact that DANFS doesn't cover the merchant career of a ship that saw naval service. Flagging naval ships that were also used in the merchant marine with a "Merchant Ship Stub" would be a useful way to request improved coverage of their non-military activities.Djembayz (talk) 17:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:Newspaper stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
currnetly oversized and in need of a good sort but before I continue with that the following would appear to be useful

the following categories are already viable

while a number of european countries may need there own templates creating based on numbers that I don't currently have. Waacstats (talk) 10:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Organic compound stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized and far from my area of expertise but the following appearviable splits unless someone knows different

Waacstats (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Pennsylvania geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Already have templates for all the counties but none,that are not already split out, ready to split so I propse we go with

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:Sri Lanka geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
CAtegory is oversized propose splitting by province in the following way, categories only where there are more than 60 articles.

Should be enough to cut this one down abit. Waacstats (talk) 13:50, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:German military personnel stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized propse splitting along the lines ok UK and US categories i.e

any other/better ideas? Waacstats (talk) 13:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Oenochrominae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Oenochrominae-stub}}. Main category: Category:Oenochrominae. Article: Oenochrominae. I am still carving out the main category for this, but this already has 75 articles, and I believe they're all stubs. This will help reduce the Category:Geometridae stubs oversized category. Dawynn (talk) 10:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Support - it should add to the proposal below in cutting this 3000 article beast down in size. Waacstats (talk) 09:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{2000s-pop-punk-album-stub}}, {{2000s-classical-album-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Album stubs are out of control. Here are a few suggestions that should have absolutely no problem hitting 60. I can't make them myself, though, so somebody else please do this. 174.98.251.19 (talk) 13:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
don't know that Category:Album stubs itself is out of control but certainly some of its subcats are and thse may well help. Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Like I said, I'm an IP and intend to stay this way. I will sort these if someone just makes the templates. (And I was talking about albums in general. I've sorted literally thousands of these things over various addresses/my old username. 174.98.251.19 (talk) 03:23, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Luxembourg-footy-bio-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
passed the 60 mark speedy Category:Luxembourgian football biography stubs. Waacstats (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Italian football midfielder stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
category is oversized propose split by decade of birth as with other nations Russia, England,Brazil etc categories where 60 articles exist. When we have done this with other countries we have done the defenders and strikers at the same time, any objections to doing that here? Waacstats (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Actinopterygii stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
more deoversizing

all should be viable. Waacstats (talk) 09:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Asteraceae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cat is oversized propose

should all be viable. Waacstats (talk) 09:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Catocalinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
more oversized moths

Should be viable. Waacstats (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Bromeliad stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
more oversized grasses

Should be viable. Waacstats (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nymphalidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
anyone spot a pattern, oversized

should all be viable. Waacstats (talk) 08:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Pattern spotted. Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Perciformes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
More de-oversizing

should all be viable. Waacstats (talk) 08:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Poaceae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
guess what, this ones oversized

should all be viable. Waacstats (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh, really? Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Prehistoric fish stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized category

should be viable. Waacstats (talk) 07:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:tephritidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized cat another proposal

Waacstats (talk) 07:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:tachinidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized cat another proposal

Waacstats (talk) 07:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:Geometridae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
the following should be viable

should take a little out of this oversized category. Waacstats (talk) 07:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{France-play-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
French language play stubs.Starzynka (talk) 17:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Support, naturellement. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category: Compliance Software

Hello, after finding 1,496 articles in Wikipedia that came up for "Compliance Software", I would like to propose this stub. Perhaps "Tax" could be a sub-category later on, or compliance by governing body (by nation, by state, etc.). Is this also where to propose copy for the stub?

Spacecraft by country

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create some.

These will be subcategories of the existing category.

In addition, upmerged templates would be created for other countries, initially feeding into the existing category. If any of these templates should achieve sixty transclusions, then a category will be proposed under criterion S1. I am undecided as to whether a threshold for creation of such templates should be set, and if so at what level. I would suggest a minimum of somewhere between five and fifteen spacecraft for a template, with my personal preference being ten. An alternative would be to create templates for every country that qualifies with not threshold. If no consensus has been reached on a threshold within the normal lifespan of this proposal, (ie five days), then I will create templates for the highest threshold that is under consideration, whatever that may be. If no comments are made on the level of the threshold then I will set it at ten spacecraft. This table shows the templates which would be created under each of the thresholds:

Country Approx articles Proposed template name
15 article threshold
Japan 32 Template:Japan-spacecraft-stub
Europe* 25 Template:Europe-spacecraft-stub
France 22 Template:Japan-spacecraft-stub
China 19 Template:China-spacecraft-stub
United Kingdom 15 Template:UK-spacecraft-stub
10 article threshold
India 14 Template:India-spacecraft-stub
Netherlands 10 Template:Netherlands-spacecraft-stub
Luxembourg 10 Template:Luxembourg-spacecraft-stub
5 article threshold
Germany 8 Template:Germany-spacecraft-stub
Canada 6 Template:Canada-spacecraft-stub
Sweden 5 Template:Sweden-spacecraft-stub
No threshold

Template:Argentina-spacecraft-stub · Template:Australia-spacecraft-stub · Template:Brazil-spacecraft-stub · Template:Chile-spacecraft-stub · Template:Colombia-spacecraft-stub · Template:CzechRepublic-spacecraft-stub · Template:Denmark-spacecraft-stub · Template:Egypt-spacecraft-stub · Template:Hungary-spacecraft-stub · Template:Indonesia-spacecraft-stub · Template:Israel-spacecraft-stub · Template:Italy-spacecraft-stub · Template:Jersey-spacecraft-stub · Template:Kazakhstan-spacecraft-stub · Template:Malaysia-spacecraft-stub · Template:Mexico-spacecraft-stub · Template:NewZealand-spacecraft-stub · Template:Norway-spacecraft-stub · Template:Pakistan-spacecraft-stub · Template:Romania-spacecraft-stub · Template:SaudiArabia-spacecraft-stub · Template:Singapore-spacecraft-stub · Template:SouthAfrica-spacecraft-stub · Template:SouthKorea-spacecraft-stub · Template:Spain-spacecraft-stub · Template:Taiwan-spacecraft-stub · Template:Turkey-spacecraft-stub · Template:Ukraine-spacecraft-stub · Template:UnitedArabEmirates-spacecraft-stub

*Whilst Europe is not a country there are a number of stubs for ESRO, ESA and EUMETSAT spacecraft which would not fall into any narrower geographical area. If there is opposition to the inclusion of Europe, but not to the rest of the proposal, then I will implement the proposal but omit Europe from it.

If a threshold is set then countries below the threshold will continue to use the existing template. Once the threshold is reached then they will be re-proposed under criterion S2. Templates for countries which do not currently have any stubs will also be proposed under S2 when enough stubs have been created to meet the threshold, or upon the creation of their first stubs if no threshold is set. --GW… 20:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

  • I like a threshold of 5 for this, not because of how many will be in the sub-categories but by how many will be in the parent. Europe is an obvious inclusion. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
    • Support the above proposal witha threshold of 5, 1 question would a Category:European spacecraft stubs be an idea to upmerge a lot of the templates to, I'm sure it would have over 60 articles or are you trying to keep European space agency craft seperate? Waacstats (talk) 10:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
      I had proposed the European template to handle instances of pan-European spacecraft: ESA, ESRO, ELDO, EUMETSAT, etc. I was not planning to use it for European countries without templates. If that use is desired then it would be possible, however I would also suggest templates and categories for other continents. Personally, I don't think that it is necessary, and it can always be proposed at a later date if it is needed. --GW… 15:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

* Should be {{PRChina-spacecraft-stub}} and {{ROChina-spacecraft-stub}}. Is it going to covered artificial satellites as well? 112.118.163.206 (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)banned user commentary struck.

Okay, that's had five days. Since there were no objections I'm creating the categories, and templates with a threshold of five articles. Since the anon was the only person to suggest a different title for the China stub template, and others supported the proposal as it was, and since both "China" and "PRChina" are used by existing stubs, I will use the form included in the original proposal, with a redirect at the alternative title. I would suggest that further discussion be held on the template's talk page to determine the best long-term title. --GW… 22:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Don't bother. Use the proposed title. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
For the record I am creating Template:France-spacecraft-stub because although it was not explicitly listed above, its omission was an obvious error (a row for France was included in the table, but I accidentally listed the Japanese template instead of the French one). --GW… 22:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Moth stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'm still trying to get a handle on why this category is so large. Based on work I've done to categorize all the articles in the main Category:moths, I'd like to propose a few new splits.

The next few here would be bridging categories. While they would not have the 60 article limit on their own, they will be parent to existing stub categories.

These last several would only be upmerge templates for now:

By my calculation, this should bring the Category:moth stubs down to about 130 or so under the {{moth-stub}} template itself. At that point, I can at least review whether the remaining articles are in the proper main categories. Dawynn (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Support all , I assume {{Tineoidea stubs}} should be Category:Tineoidea stubs. Waacstats (talk) 07:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes. Corrected above. Dawynn (talk) 11:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{Encyclopedia-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Seems to make sense. Dr. Blofeld White cat 22:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Have we many articles. Waacstats (talk) 10:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Support, Diego Grez what's up? 02:05, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{S1|Telugu cinema stubs}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Template:Tollywood I request to create a stubs for Telugu Cinemas.--Ranjithsutari (talk) 18:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Oppose see Category:Telugu-language film stubs Dr. Blofeld White cat 22:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nolidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposed template: {{Nolidae-stub}}. Main article: Nolidae. Main category: Category:Nolidae. Cat scan indicates 67 articles can be pulled from Category:Moth stubs. Dawynn (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 22:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Zygaenidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposed template: {{Zygaenidae-stub}}. Main article: Zygaenidae. Main category: Category:Zygaenidae. Cat scan indicates that this will take 88 articles from the oversized Category:Moth stubs. This, along with other proposed changes, should drive the moth stubs under 800. Dawynn (talk) 11:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hong Kong film director stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
About 50 articles tagged with {{HongKong-film-director-stub}}. Many more in Category:Hong Kong film directors are of stub quality. New category to be subcategory of Category:Asian film director stubs, Category:Hong Kong film stubs and Category:Hong Kong people stubs. 61.18.170.176 (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Support as long as it's viable, which it appears to be. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
No opinion but I'm noting this proposal is by a banned user, and have corrected one of the proposed sub-cats in the proposal. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
Comment: Is there any WikiProject specifically on the cinema of Hong Kong? 112.118.149.119 (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
[1] SchmuckyTheCat proposed to make it a subcategory of Category:Chinese film director stubs instead. 112.118.149.119 (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
No oppositions for almost a month. Done. Diego Grez what's up? 18:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pichilemu stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have created {{Pichilemu-stub}}, to contain all stub articles in the Category:Pichilemu, and the ones that are coming. Currently articles on this category are tagged with {{Chile-stub}}, {{Chile-geo-stub}} or {{geo-stub}}, and an own stub template would be really useful. Thanks! Diego Grez ¡aprende a llorar! 17:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

It seems that all the Pichilemu stubs are tagged on its respective category. Diego Grez what's up? 23:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:American painter stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Split by decade of birth (how far back? There are articles as early as 1700, if not earlier.), cats when they become viable >60. (Would genera be better? There is some overlap.) Cats by century for now (18th, 19th, and 20th). ~Gosox(55)(55) 14:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Support categories by century, templates by decade (there should be more than enough to make this viable.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Egyptologist-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Seems reasonable. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Support ~Gosox(55)(55) 12:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Templates by provinces of DRC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Democratic Republic of the Congo templates by province. Veyr large country, Only 250 odd at the moment but I intend making many stubs.Starzynka (talk) 21:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Not a bad idea. Support all - cats as they become necessary. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 23:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good. I thought DRC was already split... Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

split of Category:Fencing biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized largest countries are Sweden and Germany should just scrape 60 for Category:Swedish fencing biography stubs and Category:German fencing biography stubs. Waacstats (talk) 22:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Support taking a stab at this. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vietnam rails stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Recent creation of more railway stubs. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 13:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/July&oldid=1138356787"