Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/The World's Greatest Tag Team/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The World's Greatest Tag Team[edit]

Main contributors: Nikki311, Deep Shadow, NiciVampireHeart

I am nominating the topic The World's Greatest Tag Team as a Good Topic. The World's Greatest Tag Team was a professional wrestling tag team in WWE, comprised of Shelton Benjamin and Charlie Haas. The team originally started out as a faction known as Team Angle which was captained by Kurt Angle. Out of the four articles in the topic, three are Good articles (The World's Greatest Tag Team, Charlie Haas and Kurt Angle), and Shelton Benjamin is a Featured article. ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 11:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: Passes criteria for GT--WillC 13:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - seems like you guys are going for the record of wikiproject with the most topics! rst20xx (talk) 23:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems like it doesn't it? :P ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 14:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Passes from what I can see. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Really quite impressive work. Have you guys thought, given the extensive number of GA/FAs you're showing in these topics, of finishing off an entire active WWE show's roster and getting an FT on that? (be hard work to maintain, but it'd be big). Staxringold talkcontribs 21:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • That would be near impossible. WWE's roster is near 90 people and changes constantly. TNA Wrestling's is near 50ish and changes as well. Nice idea though.--WillC 22:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ALL of WWE, just one show. Like... The RAW roster (or at least the notable members)? Staxringold talkcontribs 00:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well they are all in one list. To break them up into brands would somewhat be content forking. Even though, they still change constantly. New guys get moved up from FCW, signed then debut, released, or moved from another brand.--WillC 00:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's an interesting idea Staxringold, but it'd be near impossible to maintain as a topic. People are constantly released, sent back down to developmental, brought up from development, not all of them have articles, etc. I'm certainly not up to the challenge. :) ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 14:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • SupportTerrence and Phillip 05:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]