Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Boeing 720 Controlled Impact Demonstration.jpg

Reason: image is of poor quality, crop is poor, and uncropped image exists as well. Considering the cameras NASA has, this is a terrible shot.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/CID post-impact 1.jpg
Nominator: Nezzadar ^[SPEAK]

Delist — Nezzadar ^[SPEAK] 20:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional Support~~ based on the success of lack thereof of the current nomination. As stated there, the cameras NASA had at the time are likely not equal to the ones they have now. Also, they don't go smashing up jumbo jets on a regular basis, so the difficulty of reproduction compensates, in my view, for these technical short comings.

Edit history indicates above unsigned statement made by Cowtowner.

Umm, is that conditional keep or conditional delist? Nezzadar ^[SPEAK] 05:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I intended that to be a conditional support of the delist. However it's now a delist. Cowtowner (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-not so bad as the nominator says.--Avala (talk) 11:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist; Crop is very unfortunate. Uncropped image or less cropped image is much better as it reveals the context (i.e. demonstartion rather than real accident)
Alt
Elekhh (talk) 12:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Please leave a note on the talk pages of the original creator/uploader and/or FPC nominator to let them know the delisting is being debated." Makeemlighter (talk) 03:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The crop is definitely unfortunate, I would be in favor of delisting the crop if the uncropped was promoted. This is a controlled crash test done in 1984, so I don't buy the "nasa has better cameras" crap, for the cost of one of these jets and to setup a test like this this would of been the best high-speed camera setup around in 1984. Probably best not to be injecting your POV that you think nasa had better cameras at this time but decided not to waste them on a mega-exensive test like this, because that is all it is, your opinion, not backed up by any facts. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 08:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Since we've prompted another version of this, this crop can be delisted. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 01:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Per Avala — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.113.142.121 (talk • contribs) 07:08, 13 November 2009

Question Can someone explain how a blocked IP address voted here? Nezzadar ^[SPEAK] 19:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in to vote. --jjron (talk) 12:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. Redundant image now that array is featured. This makes five delist votes, so can we move this one along now... --jjron (talk) 15:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per jjron. Time3000 (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Makeemlighter (talk) 23:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]