Oppose - We already have a picture just like this that is already featured and found in the exact same page. Do we need two? Mattximus (talk) 00:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Having an existing FP doesn't mean we should simply decline. If necessary we delist the old one (though I'm not advocating that). -- King of♥♦♣ ♠ 01:53, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well I suppose we could delist the second one if you think the first one is better. But there is no reason to have 2 featured pictures of the same thing, this is not normal for featured picture and has been grounds for opposition in the past. How many picture of stairs going in a circle do we need? Mattximus (talk) 13:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mattximus: I oppose delisting. These are simple two different staircases, i can understand delisting one of two shots of same stuff. How many pictures: my is from above, you can have from bottom too (and FP picture is from bottom), its different, and you can have wooden staircase also... many, but different. Or, if you go like this, what will be feutered pic for tomorrow, following one per "each" category. Wiki Commons is more reliable on this. I had case with this shot here, almost failed because of "rules". In Commons, rules are rules, but our thinking prevail first. So, no delisting, normal voting of different stuff. --PetarM (talk) 06:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I guess then I would oppose on EV grounds. A second picture of a staircase shot from a visually similar angle does not add any new encyclopedic value to the article on stairs. It is a nice photograph though! Mattximus (talk) 13:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above. This isn't Commons, and we should keep it that way. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=1){kind=link}
.jpg&oldid=1141917366){kind=link}