User talk:Sephiroth storm/Archives/2009

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 05:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


Thanks! Sephiroth storm 03:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Howdy!


I was just reading the edits on the Bhutto assassination and noticed you were a contributer. I'm based out of Seymour Johnson in NC. I've been down to Cherry Point and Lejuene a couple of times to work on the Ospreys (God knows they need work!). Anyway, thanks for your contribution to the military and to wikipedia!
Falcofire (talk) 15:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

{| width=100% style="background:none;"

|- |valign=top style="border:1px solid black; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color:#EEEEEE;"|

Project News
Current Events
The Month in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats

The number of stub articles has decreased to its lowest level since the project began its focus on improving them. The goal is to get the number below 600, and we're getting close. It would be greatly appreciated if anyone could help expand and/or source an article or two. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve.

Professional wrestling
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low Total
Quality
FA 2 3 5
FL 1 5 15 21
GA 4 15 39 58
B 1 13 57 203 274
Start 2 52 221 2331 2606
Stub 1 23 600 624
Assessed 3 71 323 3191 3588
Total 3 71 323 3191 3588

|valign=top style="border:1px solid black; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color:#EEEEEE;"|

Member News
Collaboration of the Week

The article collaboration for May 25 through June 7 is Rick Rude. The Featured article collaboration is Carly Colón. Please help to improve these articles to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next articles for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, June 8.

Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Articles for Deletion
From the Editors

Contributors to this Issue:

Discussion • Suggestions • Feedback

|-

|}

Delivered: 21:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Pagan insult

Sephiroth,

In this case, the thing that needs to be verifiable isn't that Gifford said what she said, but that there is a controversy, and that the controversy matters. Since this is a biography of a living person, we have to be extremely careful about including material that is only of tangential importance. One way to determine that is through coverage in unimpeachably reliable -- generally mainstream -- sources. I didn't see those sources when I investigated the issue, but perhaps something will turn up. Nandesuka (talk) 23:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

to Sephiroth storm

oh, yes. i am a memeber of this project. I really want to help but i'm, you know, busy at school. I became an active member when it was still vacation time for us. I cannot handle it now though, but i'll try.

Neffyring (talk) 08:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)neffyring

interrogatory

'ello,

I recently noticed that Adrian Lamo has been included within the umbrella of WikiProject Malware. I'm frankly confused as to why or how this is the case - nothing cited within the article mentions malware.

In fact, unless you want to include applications with unintended consequences (which is almost everything, but I'm open to that) Adrian Lamo would seem to be a singularly unrelated article. As I believe the article states, and as I can assert (and cite sources for) I used web browsers and standard system/web tools pretty much exclusively during my criminal career.

I'm not pressuring you to take any particular action, I'd just really like some clarification :)

Please advise at your convenience. Cheers!

—Adrian~enwiki (talk) 2008-09-22 02:20Z

That's what I'm here for :)
—Adrian~enwiki (talk) 2008-09-23 01:02Z

WinFixer

I have noticed that you are softening the WinFixer article and trying to make it sound less malicious than it actually is. What experience do you have with this virus? Have you ever had an infection on your system? How did you fix it? --Robert - Northern VA (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

The first thing you did wrong was to edit the entire file at one time, mixing proper edits with those that made no sense. As a result, it is necessary to revert the entire change in order to fix a few sections.

In addition, some of the changes replaced complete sentences with phrases and gibberish. It is completely appropriate to remove those changes until you are willing to put in the effort to use complete sentences.

In many places you changed the complete meaning of a section without references. This is particularly bad since the previous data was correct and your changes are not.

So, basically, I reverted your changes because

  • You do not have correct facts
  • You did not provide references to remove facts that have been in the article for several years
  • You left some of the changes half done
  • You made major changes without adding anything to the discussion page

By the way, WinFixer is extortion, not scareware or a rogue program. It makes someone's computer unusable until you pay them to remove it. At the time the article was written, neither McAfee nor Symantec could detect or remove it. Unless you have personally tested it against ALL the WinFixer versions, you should not make a claim that they can now.

Your edits have basically changed the entire tone of the article without anything to back it up. Q Science (talk) 16:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome to CCISTF!

You're very kind for the hearty welcome! I was actually planning to start something like this myself until I found this task force. I was actually proposing an {{infosec-stub}} to help with editing, but a wikiproject is probably a better way to go. I created a user sub-page with some articles I've been reading that need editing from an information security perspective. I'll try to devote some time to adding these to the wikiproject and adding-to/cleaning these up! Thanks again. DavidBailey (talk) 11:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 Computing articles

Hello - I'm asking everyone listed at the Computer and Information Security task force to take a look at a posting from the Wikipedia 0.7 CD release. What articles aren't there but should be? Thanks --h2g2bob (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm interested

Sure, why not? :) I'll join: just tell me where to sign up. One note though: as a userbox on my userpage says, I'm a WikiGnome, and I've never written a full article (yet!). --DanielPharos (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:PORNBIO

As a member of WikiProject Pornography, I'm just letting you know there's currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography about changing the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Your opinions would be appreciated. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Malware

I'm sorry, but no, the license on that image is invalid. A large majority of the content of the image is copyrighted by Microsoft, and we are absolutely not allowed to go taking their content and relicensing it under the GFDL. There are Microsoft Windows are VMWare logos in the screenshot, for pete's sake! Warren -talk- 16:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Malware

Hello Sephiroth Storm,

I had seen your comments on WikiProject Malware, and I had seen that the project was dead .. so I would like to help you in reviving it. Malware is an extremely important topic to Wikipedia and I believe we can do more to make our articles better.

I'd really like to start getting to work to build it up.

Thanks for your time.

Kind Regards, blurpeace (talk - contributions) 01:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

About our Merger with WikiProject Software

I've been looking through the talk archives where you had allowed a merger of the whole project with Software, but I see many differences between malware and software.

I believe the leaders (or 'coordinators') are taking many projects under their control, and overall I am not approving of the current workings. It seems like their team has some sort of control issue .. generally noting to what I have seen about Twy7.

I am going to propose that we secede from WikiProject Software as our own project again, and maybe try a merger with the Computer Security Task force to create one level-headed playing field. Maybe something like Wikiproject Computer Security, underneath Computing? Not as a sub-section, but as our own WikiProject.

Malware IS considered to be software, but what we deal with is nothing compared to that of normal applications. Malware is a completely different playing field, and grouping it under software (which has enough problems of its own) might be the worse thing we could have done. Relatively speaking, we're not to far off in member count even if our members are mostly inactive.

This is why I propose we merge the two projects to form one.

Kind Regards, blurpeace (talk - contributions) 01:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

==WikiProject Malware== Thank You for your interest in WikiProject Malware! I must inform you however, that WikiProject Malware is now under the imperium of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computer_Security|WikiProject Computer Security]]. All Malware articles are currently being transfered over to the new project. In any case, we welcome you to join us at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computer_Security|WikiProject Computer Security]]!

re: Info on malware group

Thanks for dropping a note to inform me about the merge. I'm interested in most aspects of the computer field. Personally I'd like to see improvement on several of the malware, MS Antivirus, malwarebytes, etc. articles. I hope to find a way to contribute in a manner that won't get reverted or have talk pages claiming I'm attempting to "Forum". I am still relatively new to Wikipedia editing, so I need to follow the groups lead to learn how to contribute in a positive and acceptable manner. I've bookmarked a lot of the computer projects, and will try to chip in where I can. Thanks for letting me know that the malware group is joining another classroom so to speak. I look forward to adding my abilities to the project(s)... Ched (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Help with Session fixation

Could you help me out here. I am copy editing the article and would appreciate it if you could clarify one or two things for me. I refer to the last item on the talk page. Thanks. You can reply here, my talk page or the articles talk page. --Glubbdrubb (talk) 21:56, 20 January 2009

Tags

{{subst:Wel}} {{subst:User:Goodshoped35110s/Welcome Template}} {{subst:uw-vandalism1|Article}}

re: trying to get support for signing on the account

Do you think we should post anything on the IP talk page regarding this? I dropped a note to TechOutsider about it because he/she seems pretty up to speed on Norton, but haven't heard anything yet. I didn't recognize the email address as anyone I know, or that was in my email address book. I'm guessing it's someone who simply saw a post of mine somewhere, rather than someone who knows me personally. What do you think? Ched (talk) 04:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

To tell the truth, I doubt they will be back. Placing a comment on the talk page I wouldn't advise as most IP users have no idea how to check their own talk page. Sephiroth storm (talk) 04:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, that's kinda what I thought, but being kinda newish here - thought I'd seek a more seasoned editors advise. Thank you - Cheers, Ched. Ched (talk) 04:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) (sp) Ched (talk) 04:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

No Problem :) Sephiroth storm (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sephiroth_storm/Archives/2009&oldid=1144408373"