User talk:UtDicitur

Archives

Welcome!

Hello, UtDicitur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Robdurbar 20:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fingallian language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tolka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fingallian[edit]

Hi UtDicitur. I see you recently moved Fingalian language to Fingallian language by cut and paste. So you know, moves like that are deprecated as they destroy the edit history, which is necessary for attribution. I went ahead and merged the edit histories for the two pages, and left it under the "Fingallian" spelling as I think you're right (I've now moved the article to just Fingallian). If you didn't know, established editors can move pages themselves; the function is found under the arrow immediately to the left of the "search" area in most setups. If the move is obstructed or controversial in some way, you can submit a move request. Cheers, and let me know if I can help you in any way.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input re the Wikipedia Astrology Project[edit]

Hi UtDicitur

I have joined the Wikipedia Astrology project today and am contacting you as a listed member of that project. There has been a proposal to consider the project dead and merge it with 12 other alternative subjects into a new wiki project which would oversee all aspects of fringe. I think it would be a shame to lose the astrology project on the basis that it has no active participants without contacting the members directly and exploring ideas for new ways to work together on astrology-related pages. It would be very useful if you would visit the discussion and let us know if your interest in the project is still active, or what it might take to rekindle it. Regards Tento2 (talk) 09:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Republicanism in Thailand[edit]

Category:Republicanism in Thailand, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 15:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Thomas R. Porter[edit]

Hello, UtDicitur,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Thomas R. Porter should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas R. Porter .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wieno (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pirates' republic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jacobite, King George I and Stuart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of public art in Cork City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of public art in Dublin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clontarf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, UtDicitur. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello UtDicitur, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Yarsanism have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 18:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further the above, I noticed that part of your recent addition to People's Freedom Movement had been copied and pasted from the source, speficially the text that would allow its citizens at a later date to determine in a separate referendum the question of whether Jamaica should become a republic. It's concerning that the issues raised above do not seem to have been addressed, so please be very careful to ensure that you are not creating more copyright violations as this may eventually lead to you being blocked. Cheers, Number 5 7 10:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Refspam[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Ten Principles for the Establishment of a Monolithic Ideological System. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 03:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, UtDicitur. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Native Americans in the United States‎[edit]

This edit[1] is out of date. Probably true of most of the related articles as people edit them separately. Where there's a main article the summary in another articles is supposed to match the main article, but that's usually ignored. Doug Weller talk 11:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 20:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am also very concerned with the massive amounts of edits you are doing to this article, most of which are inserting out of date data and attitudes about Indigenous people. You are removing important text that contextualizes historical events, and situates living Native American communities and cultures in the past, when these communities and cultures still exist. If this POV turns out to be intrinsic to all the edits you've done, hitting "undo" on the problematic edits is not going to be possible and massive reverts are going to be required. I think you need to slow down and engage with others on the talk page, otherwise you're going to probably wind up feeling like you've wasted a lot of time once it gets reverted. It's not pleasant having to revert a massive amount of work someone's done, but looking over this, we really may have no other choice. Also, WP:RADAR - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 20:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UtDicitur, I was wondering if you had anything to say about your practically nil engagement with other editors on article talk pages? Even on your own talk page, you rarely engage with people. --Mark Ironie (talk) 00:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I have offended anyone. My only intent was to tidy up a badly organised article and make what I thought were a few uncontroversial additions. UtDicitur (talk) User_talk:CorbieVreccan, User:Mark Ironie

August 2018[edit]

One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Moxy (talk) 21:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cayuga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you review the sources?[edit]

Its a great resource to get info from others wiki articles....but there is a concern that you actually have not seen the sources you have moved over......must remember you need to seen and verify the source to use them....dont assume the sources are correct. Plus best not to move unsourced info at all. This is just a heads up!-

Standard greeting[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, UtDicitur! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I am Moxy and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Disambiguation link notification for September 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baggot Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Canal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of public art in Belfast moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of public art in Belfast, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, UtDicitur. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of public art in Belfast has been accepted[edit]

List of public art in Belfast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 03:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Tolkien" images[edit]

What's the point of the initial letter illustrations? Or the geographical images that don't depict Tolkien's world? (I made similar remarks on Talk:Arnor before realizing you were doing this more widely.) -- Elphion (talk)

They are images from the real world landscapes that inspired Tolkien. If a region is called 'Land of Holly' it seems to me to be legitimate to use an image of a holly, or 'Land of Pines' to use an image of pines trees from a Northern European landscape. It seems to me to be helpful to illustrate an article called 'Old man Willow' with a picture of of a mature willow, so that the reader can visualise better what Tolkien intended. And so on. There is also the problem that there is a severe lack of Middle-Earth images that are not copyrighted, and the articles suffer as a result. I agree that using the initial letter of the name of the location might seem a bit tenuous, but it helps to give a feel for Tolkien's world. UtDicitur (talk) 09:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So where do you draw the line? I imagine a willow might help the reader visualize Old Man Willow, but showing an ocean for Belegaer is rather overkill. And I laughed out loud at the yellow boots at Tom Bombadil. Is this generation so besotted with images that the printed word is incapable of conveying meaning? The initial letters are completely pointless and just increase network bandwidth. -- Elphion (talk) 15:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm afraid this generation is besotted with images. I'm glad you liked the yellow boots.. I think there is a humorous, whimsical side to Tom Bombadil so I thought it was appropriate. I will remove the initial letters as I agree the link is weak, but I think the other images add to the articles UtDicitur (talk) 16:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russo-Circassian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Republicanism in Papua New Guinea has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Republicanism in Papua New Guinea has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. LukeSurl^{t c} 10:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shamrock Foods for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamrock Foods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamrock Foods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 17:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]