User talk:Dhananjay S!ngh
Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Listings of india, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Agents, Promoters and Builders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for your guide and appreciation, I didn't notice that these three added links were pointing to disambiguation pages. I rectify them.
Speedy deletion nomination of Listings of india[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Listings of india requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Listings of india for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Listings of india is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Listings of india until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 00:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Journeys by Jukaso[edit]
Hello Dhananjay S!ngh,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Journeys by Jukaso for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
June 2017[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you![edit]
|
Great work Dhananjay! DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 12:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC) |
Dhananjay S!ngh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been away from Wikipedia from last three years from editing. Apart from 2-3 articles that is taken down by Wikipedia, I have created many good articles with intention to increase the knowledge base of Wikipedia. I am unable to make edit from last three years, as I am blocked, this is painful, Request you (User:Berean Hunter) to please unblock me so that I can make a good change to Wkipedia. Dhananjay Singh (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You will need to address the reason for the block, undisclosed paid editing and advertising/promotion, and also describe any conflict of interest you have with the subjects you have written about. You will also need to describe what 'good change' you want to make to Wikipedia. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 00:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dhananjay S!ngh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have contributed earlier to English and Hindi Wikipedia by creating articles like Anil Dhasmana, Rajiv Jain, Ashokdham Temple etc. Can Contribute to Hindi Wikipedia by adding new articles for existing English articles or creating new Hindi articles. There is no conflict of interest with any of the article that been created or edited earlier except the intention to make Wikipedia a better place. There has not been any undisclosed paid editing. I am a Software Engineer and graduated from NIT. I don't have a reason to depend on Wikipedia for my source of income.Thank You. Dhananjay Singh (talk) 06:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"There is no conflict of interest with any of the article that been created or edited earlier except the intention to make Wikipedia a better place" This is a meaningless statement. This is essentially, "there was no conflict of interest except where there was a conflict of interest". And we know you did violate WP:COI; see here, for example, and indeed much of the rest of your edits to Naromurar. As you have not fully and transparently addressed your conflicts of interest, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 12:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dhananjay S!ngh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay in case of this article, if you find me violating COI, please suggest, I would make a correction accordingly. Would ensure there not be a COI violation in future edits. Dhananjay Singh (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Please list all articles you are paid to edit and all those paying you.-- Deepfriedokra 17:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.