User talk:Pinkie Pie

Image tagging for File:Balloons.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Balloons.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of .xxx[edit]

The article .xxx you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:.xxx for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickbothmanlol for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Frood! ^Ohai _{What did I break now?} 03:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinkie Pie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I wanted was a WP:FRESHSTART, what's the problem in that?

Decline reason:

Per that page: "However, if an editor uses their new account to resume editing articles or topics in the same manner that resulted in harassment or a negative reputation in the first place (becoming involved in disputes, edit warring or other forms of disruptive editing), the editor will probably be recognized and connected to the old account." If you really want a truly fresh start, try editing something completely different instead of being the moth drawn to the flame. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinkie Pie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My edits were different to the ones on my old account. The old account was only found to belong to me after I was thought to be pickbothmanlol. Also, can I get a retired template on my old account?

Decline reason:

You were using both accounts atr the same time, and you had another sock before that. So, no, you were not doing the "clean start". Beeblebrox (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What "old account" are you referring too? Because according to CheckUser, SalfEnergy (talk · contribs) is also yours. Tiptoety ^talk 19:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, is Wolvoboy1 (talk · contribs) yours? Tiptoety ^talk 19:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wolvoboy1 isn't mine possibly a family member, friend or even somebody who used my router, SalfEnergy was an old username before the rename to Wagner, which is occasionally logged into after editing other Wikimedia projects because of SUL. And it was a clean start, I used Wagner occasionally by accident because I wasn't thinking straight, assume good faith. Pinkie Pie 22:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove or modify declined unblock requests Please just file a new request. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I don't even care any more, you've just lost a contributor that wanted to help the project, if you admins treat users like this I no longer wish to help with your project. Good luck, Wagner / Pinkie Pie 23:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurobeat[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurobeat, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurobeat and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurobeat during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) 15:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Caravan Palace.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caravan Palace.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]