Template talk:Presidents of Argentina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the politics and government work group.
WikiProject iconArgentina Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Presidents of Argentina, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled[edit]

Should be reviewedKeNNy 17:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Republics"[edit]

I think it is a mistake to call that the different sucession of democratic presidents "different republics". You have a different republic when you change the Constitution or Supreme Law (For example, France does have first, second, third, fourth and fifth different republics). Argentina has the same constitution since 1853 with some adjustements, but it has never been changed. It was supressed during the military dictatorships and restored in democratic governments. I think we have always had the same republic, not different ones.Aletano (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ortiz and Castillo[edit]

They were democratically-elected presidents, they shouldnt be in the "First military dictatorship" section. Thats gotta be corrected. If there was fraud on its election is not known. Anyway, it is known that there was fraud in the elections of Roca, Juarez Celman, Figueroa Alcorta amongst others, yet they are not regarded as a "dictatorship". Aletano (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confederacion Argentina[edit]

The "Confederacion Argentina" bit should be revised.


The "Pacto Federal and Argentine Confederation (1827–1862)" and "National Organization – Argentine Republic (1862–1880)" sections are wrong, mainly because they minimise the importance of the constitution of 1853.
"Pacto Federal and Argentine Confederation (1827–1862)" is a mix-up of governors of Buenos Aires province (Dorrego, Rosas) and the first Presidents of Argentina (Urquiza, Derqui, Pedernera.
I strongly suggest changing it to
Pacto Federal was signed in 1929, not in 1927, thus Dorrego cannot appear there.
Urquiza was the first president of Argentina under the current constitution. he governed all the provincies except for one: Buenos Aires (and those which still didn't exist). Mitre is not the first president, although this mistake is widely repeated. He is the first president, however, to govern all of the argentinian provinces with minor constitutional changes.
Engranaje (talk) 04:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First govs[edit]

I think we should have a 1st paragraph ( named perhaps first governments 1810-1814 ) including : Primera Junta, Junta Grande, First Triumvirate (Argentina) and Second Triumvirate (Argentina) --Jor70 (talk) 10:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea. Go on, if you please. --IANVS (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About listing acting presidents[edit]

User:76.91.189.163 points out that acting Presidents Ramón Puerta and Eduardo Camaño should not be listed, although both of them did hold office per constitutional mechanisms of succession. If the rationale for this dropping is that they were not directly elected to the office, we then should drop from the list, as well:

So, what is the rationale? The time spent as Head of State? I don't think that is a valid criteria.

I will revert, and await for you comments on the subject. Salut, --IANVS (talk) 04:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They were acting presidents, not matter why or for how long, they have the power to do lots of crap --Jor70 (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]