Template talk:Neighbourhoods of Buenos Aires

This template was considered for deletion on 2018 December 27. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Argentina Template‑class

	Argentina portal This template is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Neighbourhoods of Buenos Aires, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled[edit]

I suggest adopting a common format for the names of the barrios, especially some ambiguous ones or which have people's names. Liniers comes to mind. Probably parenthesis for disambiguation would be better than commas, since "X, Buenos Aires" reads like a town in the province, and you already have Belgrano (Buenos Aires). For once, San Nicolás, Buenos Aires already redirects to San Nicolás de los Arroyos... --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:24, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is the ambiguity between Buenos Aires and Buenos Aires Province. Nevertheless, I believe there are not much Barrios that have a name corresponding to a city in the Buenos Aires Province, so there should be no colision.

Another option would be to use Belgrano (barrio), but it looks like hell.

The names where taken from the almost defunct Barrios of Buenos Aires article.Mariano(t/c) 14:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, "Retiro" also points to Colombia, I'll change that. We need to eliminate the redirect and add a disambiguation page for "San Nicolas". --Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 21:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I created San Nicolás, Buenos Aires article on the Neighbourhood. Check it out. Mariano(t/c) 09:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As Mr Burns says "Exxxccceelllent". :) --Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 15:03, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]