Template talk:Moldova topics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Red links that might be useful to add to this template if they become blue[edit]

History and Symbols[edit]

Geography, Administration, and Demographics[edit]

Politics[edit]

Economy[edit]

Culture and others[edit]

Blue links for this template[edit]

History and Symbols[edit]

Geography, Administration, and Demographics[edit]

Politics[edit]

Economy[edit]

Culture and others[edit]

Transnistria topics[edit]

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

This should be the upper limit, and so it needs further selection, depending on what we have already in other templates.--Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 17:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, to be sure it is all-inclusive, I'd like to add (only in theory) the following 5 to your list. When adding these 5 I only looked at what you have selected, and tried to see if there could be other articles of equal weight that would could have missed. But in making this list, on purpose I did not want to consider whether any of them are actually needed for the template Moldova topics.

Second, for the purpose of easing the selection, I am going (in the next edit) to reorder the items on the list (I will erase absolutely nothing). Dc76\talk 03:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

template draft[edit]

Excellent job, Piccolo! I only would rather not put Constitution under Law, because it is not a real law. If there were a settlement of the conflict and under that settlement Transnistria would have a Constitution, it would be a different thing. But as it is now, we aould have to write about Chechnya's constitution and so on. Now, nothing prevents to write about de facto situation with legal acts in Transnistria, so a specific article Law in Transnistria I think would be ok. Also, I would reorder the grouping slightly differently: History, Geography, POlitics, Law, Military, Economy, Demographics, Culture. Dc76\talk 22:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, I guess, we will have the above template (feel free to implement it), and this one. The rest, I believe are redundant now and can be erased. Dc76\talk 22:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I moved all the code to Template:Transnistria topics (that thing earlier wasn't really a transclusion). I plan on nominating the templates you named for deletion, which should be uncontroversial.--Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 03:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
even today, i only have a vague idea what transclusion is. imagine me then. Dc76\talk 03:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to find out more, just read WP:TRANSCLUSION. The tfd nomination is at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_January_28#Transnistrian_conflict.--Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 03:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]