Template talk:Islamic alchemy and chemistry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconHistory of Science Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconChemistry Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconIslam Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Major rewrite January 2021[edit]

There are probably still too many names on this list: those scholars who knew some chemistry but did not really contribute anything significant should probably be removed from this template. On the other hand, chemistry did not just disappear from the Islamic world in the fifteenth century, and this list really suffers from the narrow and exclusive attention given by scholarship to those figures who would be important to later European history. Names from significant Muslim alchemists from the fifteenth to the eighteenth century should be added in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apaugasma (talkcontribs) 20:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]