Talk:Isotopes of seaborgium
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
comment[edit]
The half lives for Sg-269 and Sg-271 are not similar on the first page compared with the list of isotopes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.103.68.65 (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC) ="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.103.68.65 (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Isotopes of seaborgium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225154203/http://www.gsi.de/informationen/wti/library/scientificreport2006/PAPERS/NUSTAR-SHE-05.pdf to http://www.gsi.de/informationen/wti/library/scientificreport2006/PAPERS/NUSTAR-SHE-05.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Beta stability of 268Sg[edit]
Given the mass shown in the table, it seems very likely that 268Sg is beta-stable! Of course, we need to reduce the uncertainties of the mass measurements to a quarter of what they are now to conclude. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)