This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
maybe a list of tombs should be added after locations? including (besides kv55) kv 54, kv57, wv22, wv23, wv25 (?) and the amarna royal tomb. --!linus (talk) 21:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for unintentionally messing around with the template's internal list structure (happened during a recent edit, that was only supposed to change 1 tiny detail). I have restored all lost parameters and the special "Children" layout as sub-field of "Family". The list structure is now a bit more compact, but the functionality should be unchanged from the "original" version. GermanJoe (talk) 14:48, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
_01.svg){kind=small}
