Talk:Quebec law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"La coutume de Paris"?[edit]

Are there any sources for this? --134.117.200.239 (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- inserted citations and link to wiki article on coutumes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External Link to Civil Code[edit]

hey... that external link is a 404. anyone know where it's moved to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.53.42.216 (talk) 13:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- fixed the links. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quebec law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lawyers in Quebec[edit]

Deleted the following sentence: « Advocates are similar but not identical to the all-purpose lawyers of the common law system because Quebec advocates are restricted to litigation and any other contentious legal business (e.g. torts, crimes, will contests, divorces, etc.).»

The sentence is inaccurate and it was actually too inaccurate to save.

First off, the so-called "common law system" does not include as a universal feature the "all-purpose lawyers" mentioned in the sentence. Many common law jurisdictions such as the U.K. and Australia still maintain two distinct legal professions (i.e. barristers and solicitors).

Secondly, Quebec advocates are not "restricted to litigation and other contentious legal business". That statement has no basis in fact or law. Many (perhaps most) advocates never see the inside of a courtroom and spend all their time in what would traditionally be considered non-contentious "solicitor's work". Advocates can perform all legal work except instrumentation of certain deeds which the law requires to be notarial acts (i.e. real estate conveyances, marriage contracts, notarial wills, etc.) and a couple of other specific acts which notaries can do such as officiate at weddings.