Talk:Pagination

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

更新刪除

1550[edit]

And now I see this pagination word was alive and well in 1550 era.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagination"

To the author of this comment, you have missed the point. This article is referring to the actual use of pagination...not the origin/genesis of the word.

Biased references[edit]

All but one reference is some obscure reference to a PHP blog of some kind, of which I suspect the contributors of this article has a connection to. --Bep (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't these correlated?[edit]

Layout (computing)

--Erquint (talk) 08:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose No reasoning given by nominator. Nor does it seem like a good idea. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Pagination and page numbering are two different things. It does not make sense to merge them into one article. Proposer did not give any reasoning as well. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 03:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge 2[edit]

Back in March 2019 the proposed merging Pagination and Page numbering, giving the justification (in an unsupported reason field in the merge template):
the lead of page numbering indicated these are the same topic: "process of applying a sequence of numbers (or letters, or roman numerals) to the pages of a book or other document".
Thoughts? Klbrain (talk) 16:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there are no views expressed, I should point out that oppose the proposal, on the grounds that these are different things; Pagination is the process of dividing a document into pages (for example, in the process of bookbinding) which is quite different and independently notable from the practices involved in page numbering. I note that there were also objections when this was previously proposed. Klbrain (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
更新刪除 5678bgu (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]