Talk:Mining engineering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, I started an article in February called Mining Engineering. I recently realised I named it against convention, so I decided to move the whole article here. However, when I found this article, I decided to incorporate as much the other article into this one as possible, and change all the links to point here. CrazyCanuck

I've merged the page histories now so Mining Engineering is just a redirect. Angela. 23:43, Mar 24, 2004 (UTC)

Subjects to be added[edit]

Mining engineering has two main field of study:

  • Mine exploration
  • Mine extraction

Mine engineers will concentrate on mining activities which are most contributed before production. Mainly:

1- Data acquisition and analysis of ore recognition, exploration and locating, using knowledges like 1.1- Geology 1.2- Geophysics 1.3- Geochemistry 1.4- Tektoniks 1.5- Paleontology

2- Mining design, in the view of how to extract and process the ore, design on underground structures and heavy structures like 2.1- Dams 2.2- Tunnels 2.3- Open pits —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bobax (talk • contribs) 11:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Quick comment:

The page needs extensive expansion. A description of explosive agents is a start in a mining process. However there is more information to be put in.

Right now, the mining industry is booming, and there is a severe shortage of engineers with a mining engineering degree. Overall, there is a shortage of engineers in all disciplines. Mining engineering also lacks in the academic arena, as only a handful of university offer it as a degree and study. This page with more information will aid any experienced mining engineer along with providing prospective students and engineering students a resource. Deekayfry (talk) 14:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added brief history of mining and the general mineral economy. Deekayfry (talk) 22:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Took a look at the over all flow of the article. I removed the "other engineering closely associated" sub-section because I will include it at the end of the article. Because Mining Engineering is so highly specialized there are few US domestic universities offering this specialized degree. Since there is a shortage of specialized degreed mining engineers, other engineering disciplines have "filled the gap."

Generally, engineers of all disciplines may find themselves working in other disciplines simply due to professional shortages or out of personal interest to target a specific discipline. 66.82.9.53 (talk) 19:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additions and Wikification[edit]

I added Health and Safety and moved Reclamation to relate to the environment. I also wikified the article somewhat. Is there anyone that can improve the format?

Also, the health and safety may need some work as in shortening or easier to read. Again, anyone who is more experienced can be of great help.

This is a nit-pick, but I am unable to figure out how to capitalize the "engineering" in the article heading "Mining engineering." Deekayfry (talk) 16:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per the MOS, engineering shouldn't be capitalized as it is not a proper noun. The Seeker 4 Talk 16:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. Thank you. Deekayfry (talk) 00:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

US-specific sections[edit]

At present, the sections "Mining health and safety" and "mining and the environment" have only US-specific content, which is inappropriate for an article such as this that covers a global topic. Both sections badly need to be expanded to cover other countries. The lengthy US coverage does not belong here, as it is already contained in other US-specific wiki articles: Mining Safety and Health Administration and Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. I would like to see the US-specific content here shrunk to a summary paragraph each, with a wiki link to the US-specific article. Any thoughts? Plazak (talk) 13:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would make a subheading under each of those sections called "US law" or "In the US" or some such, place all the US content in these sub-headings, and leave the tag requesting expansion at the top of each heading. I would also reduce the coverage to one or two paragraphs each, with appropriate "main article" links at the top of each "US" sub-heading. If i have a chance today I will work on this myself, but please don't wait for me to do it if someone else has the time as I can't guarantee I will get to it. The Seeker 4 Talk 13:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It needs work. Also, I did extensive clean up of mining definitions. Again, I am very weak at formatting. I welcome any changes and corrections. Deekayfry (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I revised the lengthy legal information on Mining Safety and Health and put it under "United States." I did not write the "mining and the environment" section so I am reluctant to change that yet. I may get to that later, but I plan to expand on the "mining process" section and contents related to that. Thank you for the input. Deekayfry (talk) 00:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further Revisions[edit]

After reading the article a few times, the overall tone is pointing to discussing Mining but not adequately Mining engineering. So, I rewrote sections that were in listed form into paragraph forms and tied them to the profession and not the definition of the action itself. I am the most guilty at losing the focus on the engineering aspect.

So, for the future I think we should look at revising the Mining Process and the Environmental section. They need to be reworked to reflect upon the study and profession and not the process itself.

FYI, I added "US Salaries and Statistics" to move the tone back to mining engineering. Deekayfry (talk) 02:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are dead-on correct in pointing out that much of the article centers on Mining (the activity) rather than on Mining engineering (the scientific disipline). Mining has its own article, and there is too much overlap here. For instance, mining goes back to prehistoric times, but I doubt that much engineering was involved until about the time of Agricola, if then. Plazak (talk) 13:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mining Jobs[edit]

Could you possibly tell about other mining jobs? HttydFan95 (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)HttydFan95[reply]

Mining Jobs[edit]

Could you possibly tell about other mining jobs? HttydFan95 (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)HttydFan95[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.mining-technology.com/
    Triggered by \bmining-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mining engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mining engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mineral exploration[edit]

Hi, I noticed that under the heading mineral exploration that it was claimed that mining engineers searched for a mineral deposit. Where this came from I can only guess. I've made an edit to reflect reality. Cheers, Markd2 (talk) 08:20, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Markd2[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mining_engineering&oldid=1194094257"