Talk:Marcomannic Wars

Military history: Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dacia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dacia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DaciaWikipedia:WikiProject DaciaTemplate:WikiProject DaciaDacia articles

Great Germannic invasion of 170 or of 167?[edit]

The article places the Great Germannic invasion, which ran all the way to Aquilleia, in AD170. Various scholars place this invasion earlier in 167: for instance see Frank McLynn in his recent (2009) book Marcus Aurelius, Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor or A. Mocsy in Pannonia and Upper Moesia. McLynn gives an entire list of authors who share this view and his arguments are compelling. I think this view should be worked in to the article. -- fdewaele, 6 July 2012.

I have added a paragraph regarding the fact that there is no unity amongst scholars regarding the exact date of the Great Germanic Invasion. -- fdewaele, 6 July 2012, 18:45 CET.

Location?[edit]

The 'location' listed in the info box says it happened along the "Whole length of river Danube, the northeastern European border...", while the info in the first paragraph says it occurred along the "whole length of the Roman empire's southeastern European border, the river Danube". South-eastern vs North-eastern? Is this a mistake? 60.242.210.126 (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely noticed. It should be "northeastern" as the empire's southeastern border would be Egypt, Syria and Arabia. I've thus corrected it in the article. - fdewaele, 20 October 2013

Marcomannia and Sarmatia[edit]

The claim that two provinces bearing these names had been intended is only alleged by the notoriously unreliable Historia Augusta. For the lack of any confirming source, the claim is doubted by consent, according to the German version of this Wikipedia entry http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markomannenkriege . Nafiris (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC) == Marcomannic Wars == == Belligerents == == Commanders and leaders == Raus and Raptus of Astingi Wikipedia entry https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerres_marcomanes Raus George de Boiu Mare (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The intended creation of Roman provinces in 'Maromannia' and 'Samartia' is mentioned by Cassius Dio who is generally hostile to the notion of expanding the empire - cf 71.33.4. There is also evidence of a major military presence in the first of these region with bath-houses indicative of intended permanent occupation. See Birley 's biography of Marcus Aurelius. PJBS Pjbjas (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marcomannic Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160806015742/http://corpus-sacrum.de/ to http://www.corpus-sacrum.de/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.satrapa1.com/articulos/antiguedad/Marco_Aurelio/marco_Aurelio.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Location of "Free Dacians"[edit]

It is mentioned in the article that "the so-called "free Dacians" living between the Danube and Roman Dacia", with regards to the third Marcomannic war. This should be a mistake because as far I know, Danube was the lower limit of the Roman Dacia. The Roman forces came from the south and crossed the Danube. The conquest of Dacia started from the Danube and ended in Transilvania. So it is not possible that Free Dacians would exist between Danube and the Roman Dacia province because there is no such territory. Danube was the limit of Roman Dacia, until the Aurelian withdraw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F05:1309:B500:1043:335D:750B:7E06 (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the maps at the end of the article, it makes sense: "the free Dacians" were between the Roman Dacia (on the west) and the Danube (on the east and south).Adrian two (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]