Talk:List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Nova Scotia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Order[edit]

The Order here is alphabetical within year (not date), as are List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Ireland and List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom and List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Great Britain and List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of England and List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Ireland but not Baronetage of the United Kingdom and Baronetage of Great Britain (which are alphabetical). - Kittybrewster 19:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have sorted all five "Lists of Baronetcies" alphabetically, updated the table on the Project Page, and each List's Talk Page to reflect that they are now in the desired order. Laura1822 19:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Complete[edit]

I have now gone throught Leigh Rayment's lists and added the missing baronetcies, so the list should now be complete (assuming Rayment hasn't missed any). Tryde (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bolles of Osberton[edit]

I have no idea where I should be posting this query, but the hyperlink associated with Bolles of Osberton misdirects to a baronetcy unconnected but with the same surname of Bolles in Scampton Lincs.

Dame Mary Bolles, Btss was the first and so far only baronetess for whom the title was created. Being a wealthy lady she purchased the baronetcy when the king offered the baronetcies of Nova Scotia as part of his fund raising drive for the new colony. The text on this page correctly mentions the basic facts but misdirects to a baronetcy which features no female baronetesses.WelbeckLincs (talk) 21:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of baronetcies in the Baronetage of Nova Scotia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]