Talk:Juan Fernández (basketball)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my comments:

"This earned him Philadelphia Big Five Player of the Week honors for the week of December 14." Full dates? When did the week start/end.
- Clarified. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 04:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilink Atlantic 10 in the junior section, most people don't know wtf is the Atlantic 10 is. YE ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I linked it in the sophomore section, where it was first mentioned I believe. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 05:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How many points did he score again SDSU? YE ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 14 points, don't see how this is unclear. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 05:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A few images might be nice. YE ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I came up with an image with his hometown, Rio Tercero. I can't find any free images on him or the Temple team. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 05:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.^[1]

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);^[2] and

(c) it contains no original research.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;^[3] and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

^[4]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

^[5]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.^[6]

Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC) Although this article has a couple minor issues, this is not significant enough for this page not to be passed. However, if you decide to take it to the WP:FAC, ill recomend that quite a few images will be needed. However, found no problems at all with the writing, which is why I passed it. Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage, is not required for good articles.
^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.
^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1] Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage, is not required for good articles.

[2] Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

[3] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

[4] Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.

[5] Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

[6] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]