Talk:Intensive animal farming

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intensive animal farming article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: 21 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Agriculture: Livestock High‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as High-importance).

Food and drink High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Animal rights Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Effective Altruism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Archives (index)

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture?[edit]

This article treats 'Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture' as synonymous with 'intensive agriculture', though this is at odds with Fish_farming#Intensive_aquaculture. I have not done much reading on aquaculture, but on first pass, I think the Fish_farming#Intensive_aquaculture section is closer to what we should cover in this article, as the 'intensive' descriptor relates to high inputs and animal density, not (necessarily) whether the system recycles waste.Dialectric (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon emissions of intensive farming[edit]

I think it would be help to add some date here on the article on carbon emissions of factory farming, which is a topic of great interest.Aerchasúr (talk) 21:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Factory farming term[edit]

Hello @Randy Kryn: I disagree with this edit. The distinction is necessary because that term is inherently POV and so either needs the qualifier or should be removed. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While opponents is a little vague, I do agree some qualifier is need to distinguish that it's a moniker that also has some accuracy/nebulous issues. I've restored the text with that in mind, but am definitely open to improvements. KoA (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I find it to be a common term. While opponents use it pejoratively, I do hear it and read it as a common term. I mean, who says 'intensive animal farming', except technologists? Alaney2k (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's common in the general public, but usually not used typically by high-quality sources or those with subject-matter expertise in agriculture topics. Because it's such a nebulous term, there isn't really a straight equivalent in more precise terminology used by scientists or farmers. Otherwise, the term wouldn't have that problem in the first place. True common names tend to be more specific such as feedlots for cattle, etc. rather than one commonly used umbrella term. Because the term factory farming is often moreso a term of perception among the general public or sometimes used for outright misinformation, it is one we have to be careful about and apply WP:GEVAL to the term by flagging it in some fashion. KoA (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the NYT source purportedly claims it's a pejorative term, it's also in the Oxford English Dictionary without any 'derogatory' label or usage notes. This indicates it's a general term for the system of farming. Terpomamanto (talk) 01:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's also in the Cambridge Dictionary [1], Dictionary of Agriculture and Land Management [2], Oxford Reference [3] and Merriam-Webster [4]. I agree, I am not seeing any mention of the derogatory label. Psychologist Guy (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I think the article should say 'also known as factory farming' instead of 'known by opponents...'. @KoA says that we should apply WP:GEVAL to this but I disagree as factory farming is at least an equally valid way of describing intensive animal agriculture. Terpomamanto (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources in agriculture such as university specialists treat it as a misleading and a nebulous term.[5][6] The NYT piece addresses some of the misconceptions the general public has about farming related to the term too. That the term is commonly used isn't really disputed, but the accuracy or ways it used is what gets discussion in sources.

You also used to hear it used a lot in fringe depictions related to anti-GMO, etc. (e.g., portraying factory farming as "dousing" GMO plants with more pesticide when it was the opposite), so the short of it for us is that it's a loaded term we have to be a bit more careful about as editors. It doesn't help that other industry terms like CAFO, etc. are just jarony too, but that gets into why this article settled on the current title as something more WP:NPOV than the others I just mentioned.

That's partly why I mentioned above that while the lead text could be improved, it's probably better to focus on a terminology section first since the term redirects here to flesh out details on that, and then go back to the lead to see what works best. Until then, the current sourced text at least works for now. KoA (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All of those sources are relevant only to limited regions of only one country, the US. Unfortunately I can't read the NYT piece since I don't have a subscription but I have doubts about it since it seems to be an opinion piece. Maybe 'factory farming' is used in the fringe depictions of factory farming you described but regardless of whether you think it's accurate that doesn't undermine its general acceptance as a term to describe the practice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxvQPzrg2Wg Terpomamanto (talk) 10:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance template[edit]

The maintenance template stating "The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject" is there since December 2017. Is it still relevant ? Should we remove this template or does the article need modifications ? Alenoach (talk) 16:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. If you think there is still modifications to be made relevant to this template, you can explain it here. Alenoach (talk) 01:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]