Talk:Deccani–Vijayanagar wars

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

South Asia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Before moving to mainspace[edit]

@Kemilliogolgi, please don't move the article to mainspace directly. Submit it through WP:AFC. Imperial ^[AFCND] 16:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kemilliogolgi, the article is marked as potential copyright violation. Please don't copy content from anywhere and post it. The entry should be in your own words. It won't be reviewed if it violates WP:COPYRIGHT. Thank you. Imperial ^[AFCND] 13:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article based on Final result[edit]

Similar to Bahmani-Vijayanagar war there should be same for Deccan Sultanates and Vijayanagar conflicts, the victories between these two states and empire was different in which both victory and losses were faced on the both side, but here it is shown as the final victory which occurred during the Battle of Talikota also known as allied victory 49.207.221.228 (talk) 15:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mispelled?[edit]

@Chronikhiles, hello. The "Vijayanagar" term is not a mispelled version of "Vijayanagara". See the Ngram graph [1] comparison here. Both terms are used to refer the same place. Imperial ^[AFCND] 09:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain. The name of the empire is correctly rendered Vijayanagara with the a, as you can find in the article on the empire. Vijayanagar minus the a is a schwa-deleted rendering of the name of the empire in northern Indian languages. Vijayanagar is indeed widely used as a result of this process, but Vijayanagara is the correct native term for it. Perhaps alternative rendering is a better way to put it than mispelled, if you please. I do believe WP:CONSISTENT applies here either way. If you feel this was an uncalled for bold action, feel free to revert the change, I'll propose the move instead. Cheers. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 09:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I won't disagree. Using "Vijayanagar" shouldn't pose any issue imho, especially considering the disambiguation page for the Bahmani-Vijayanagar War. I predominantly opted for "Vijayanagar" over "Vijayanagara" because that's how most of the sources I referenced referred to it. But if you believe I made a mistake, please feel free to move all instances of "Vijayanagar" used in the MILHIST articles. Regards. Imperial ^[AFCND] 10:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]