Talk:A. H. Almaas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

I merged Ridhwan School and Diamond Approach to this article. Ruslik (talk) 08:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good idea. It doesn't read like a biography now. Contrast Ken Wilber and Jack Kornfield who are mentioned in the Critiques section of this page. Martindo (talk) 09:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A.H. Almaas re-categorization[edit]

I notice that Otto4711 removed the category Sufi psychology from the A. H. Almaas article. Sorry, but I've re-added it.

As it says in the article, "The curriculum of the work draws upon the founders' backgrounds in Sufism". See mentions of Sufism and lataif in the article, and these plus nafs and "higher self" in his writings. These are concepts belonging to the practice of Sufi psychology. Thanks, Esowteric+Talk 11:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer see lataif mentioned in the article. What happened to it? Gempolisher (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Circular[edit]

If you were unknown in society, and you wanted to host a big party with lots of big celebrities, the method you would use is to draw up a list of celebrities, and tell each one that all the others had confirmed they were attending your party.

I get a similar reaction to this sentence from the article:

" In recent years the work of Almaas has received high praise from important spiritual teachers and explorers such as John Welwood, Brant Cortright, Jack Kornfield and Ken Wilber.[9] "

As someone who has studied this area for many decades, I can say that none of these people are "important". Famous, maybe. The latter two are famous for being famous, in the same way as Lindsay Lohan.

There is a Ramana Maharshi book called "Who Am I ?" which contains the entirety of the meaning of life, the universe and everything, and is 12 pages long. This is roughly 500 pages shorter than the average Wilber book, and he has written dozens.

Sorry, by definition, there are not thousands of important things. It is contrary to the definition of important.

So, the sentence is pure marketing hype. But I did not remove it, because it would just be restored by some fanboy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.126.201.63 (talk) 01:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If they're important enough to have a Wikipedia page, they're probably worth mentioning when trying to help others understand why *this* person is important. Gempolisher (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

This article contains too much propaganda. Aiko (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This is too general a complaint. What is the propaganda? This needs to be specific so that any corrections or clarifications can be put forward.RobnBC (talk) 21:24, 30 June 2013 (UTC) RobnBC (talk) 21:24, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on A. H. Almaas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A. H. Almaas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gut article?[edit]

This article is based almost wholly on a few primary resources and has done so for years. There is a neutrality dispute tag since 2013, a need for additional citations for verification tag since 2015 and a tag for relying too much on primary sources since 2017. May I follow WP:BOLD and just delete all the offending material? IrishStephen (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:A._H._Almaas&oldid=1197126187"