File talk:CentralEurope.png
Untitled[edit]
hello.
How can one say part of a country is part of Central Europe, and the rest of the country is not ? How do you explain Romania has one foot in Central Europe ? Where is the second ?
People should be careful when dividing countries un-conaiseurs-ly, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.104.76 (talk) 16:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
...[edit]
These light green areas used to be parts of German and Austro-Hungarian empire in the past, so they are considered parts of Central Europe for historical, geographical and/or cultural reasons.--Lu Louis (talk) 00:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Wallachia & Moldavia(region of Romania)[edit]
Recently user Iaaasi keeps marking whole Romania as a CE country, but as culturally as geographically it belongs to another region. Wallachia & Moldavia wasn't part of Central Europe, hence it shouldn't be included in the map either. If you accept (full)Romania as a CE country, we should add Belarus, Ukraine and the country of Moldavia too. --Csendesmark (talk) 18:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
...[edit]
I disagree that the Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova should be given the same historical, cultural etc. treatment as Romania. On the other hand, Croatian and Serbian examples are very comaprable to the Romanian case. Taking their complex historical and present structure, my view is that these countries should be trated the same way as the country in question. If Romania is included as a whole, Croatia and Serbia (w/o Kosovo, which has been a separate territory) should be included as well. NeroN_BG
